Previous thread: https://eu.forums.blizzard.com/en/wow/t/on-going-harassment-or-how-blizzard-dont-care-about-it-vol-2/419077
This time, I’d like to bring in some elaboration, theory and raise a general concern in regards to how Blizzard handles privacy & how it should be handled. I believe that AD forums aren’t the best place to raise this concern in particular. Rather, it should be CS forum or something. But because I’ve previously posted here the previous topic, I’d like to give some consistency. This knowledge may become handy to those who roleplay, after all.
First and foremost. In order to provide some solid evidence & proof, I’ll have to de-anon myself. Or rather, it will become quite obvious once you’ll go through the link provided below. But it is what it is. My right for privacy has been stripped away from me regardless, I lose nothing regardless. Best thing I can say, mistakes were done, lessons learned, so forth.
In previous thread people speculated how does my stalker learn my alts and so forth.
Turns out, things are easier than “installing a virus” on my computer or something alike. Me and a few friends tested a theory based on some screenshots that were received from the others, to whom, said stalker has shared as “evidence” that I’m a bad person. (P.S - he generally does this to off-put other roleplayers from RPing/Talking to me).
[Link removed] - Character added to the database.
This supports a theory that he has developed own addon that has a database structure and either he automatically (which is most likely. I doubt someone would manually add someone with that name anyway) or manually adds targets to this database.
Since Blizzard does NOT turn off API code by default, it allows websites like check-pvp to expose your alts to others. If API is disabled, you can still go to WoW armory page and do a comparison check via pets.
I think that the latter option is exactly what he does. Either manually or, most likely, has integrated it into his addon to do quick requests from the armory to pin point if this character belongs to someone he knows.
Other than that, he uses two other functions & methods:
[Link removed] - using low-level rogue alts to be in stealth and at range, as maximum as /s /e allows you to be in order to read those.
and
[Link removed] - using some parameters to identify when he’s in range or not + using good old fashion /add people to friendlist in order to track their whereabouts & using simple macros of /target to fly around and scan surroundings for the people.
Now, I’ve mentioned that me and my friends tested a theory. It was simple. I HSed to Garrison. One of my friends, on a character that never interacted with any character of mine, separately HSed into Garrison. Their API was disabled too.
A few minutes within Garrison, this dropped by, reported by another friend of mine:
[Link removed]
So what we have in the end are old mechanics that were introduced a long while ago and are easily exploitable to stalk & harass.
- Allowance of low-level characters to use public chats.
- Usage of /who
- Ability to add anyone to a friendlist without their permission needed & track their whereabouts.
- Enabled, by default, API code that can be used to expose your alts.
- Inability to de-assign pets. Once assigned, you’re stuck with them and this can be exploited against you by “guess&compare”.
- Usage of toys upon others (like pumpkins) if they are not in /party /raid /guild
I do not say what must be done about them. There’s more than 1 way about it. But from my personal experience, these are easily exploited to harass & stalk people in-game.
Finally, I’ve been asked by someone to make a compilation of my stalker’s activity on me and as I’ve said, it’ll de-anon me. But to be fair, I no longer care about it. Only reason why I’m using this character to make another post, is because I used the same character on previous post(s). Some form of consistency.
Full evidence compilation
Images evidence: [Link removed]
Video evidence: [Link removed]
Don’t know if the thread gets deleted from this or not, as in-thread itself, names are not mentioned.
But I’d like to highlight that as per Blizzard ToS terms:
Disruption / Harassment: Engage in any conduct intended to disrupt or diminish the game experience for other players, or disrupt operation of Blizzard’s Platform in any way, including:
Disrupting or assisting in the disruption of any computer used to support the Platform or any Game environment. ANY ATTEMPT BY YOU TO DISRUPT THE PLATFORM OR UNDERMINE THE LEGITIMATE OPERATION OF ANY GAME MAY BE A VIOLATION OF CRIMINAL AND CIVIL LAWS.
Harassment, “griefing,” abusive behavior or chat, conduct intended to unreasonably undermine or disrupt the Game experiences of others, deliberate inactivity or disconnecting, and/or any other activity which violates Blizzard’s Codes of Conduct or In-Game Policies.
and Social Contract:
https://imgur.com/a/Cuh81hd
It’s ming-boggling how despite an overwhelming amount of evidence of this violation to the tos/contract for years, it took Blizzard a year to issue a 1-week suspension and another 6 months to issue another 1-week suspension, as all the harassment has resumed after the suspension was lifted.
And yes, I know. Police. I already contacted his police station, it was promptly disregarded to contact my police station first. And while I know that it’s an adequate legal way. I do have a fear that it’ll be laughed off when I come up to them with something like:
“I have a dude in an online-game that monitors my activity and throws pumpkins on me.”
But that’s my personal issue.
Thanks for coming to my Ted-Talk again.
P.s - It’d be great if Blizzard at least would update gameplay mechanics to ensure privacy is actually valued (API code included). Instead of forcing this abstract social contract that doesn’t simply work. Its like safety rules. Everyone read it, no one cares & no one checks.