BAN Raider.IO

As i told you above. It is not RIO problem and why i think that. I.e. I would look player for Freehold and AD, and you pop in queue, I would pick you. If ML would be my destination i would take the other guy, who has least been in there. Because I do not want to explain people they’d need to dispell someone on that one boss - they should know it.

And if someone declines you from FH due RIO, as I said its just a monkey you wouldn’t want to team up begin with. RIO is not at fault, when people are stupid and cannot use the data correctly.

1 Like

I am sorry, you said that maths didn’t make sense. I explained maths. Error factors multiply, this leaves no room for the signal. What part doesn’t make sense?

People lost OWN critertia, only criteria they look is rio, they not care to anyhting else, if you have low rio you will be treated as rubbish, and thats the sadly how retail WoW work.

Then how did I get started this season on my paladin? I started with no rio score on it. I’ve strcitly pugged all my highest keys this season on my paladin.

You are seeking to discount a system that is a pure reflection of experience. Maths can not remove any of that or make it ineffective.

Matchmaking system takes your own rating and looks for similarly rated player to match your with. They are mostly used in game where players compete against other players. It often takes into account your own personal performance, the rating of players on your team, the rating of players on the enemy team, and possibly other factors depending on what game we’re talking about. An inexperienced player can come into a new game and just be personally good at it, beat other players and just climb very quickly, just by personal performance compared to his opponents/teammates.

Rio display your M+ experience in a very basic way to let you decide if you want to take that player into your group for your keystone. Nothing about personal peformance, who you play with, what you play, where you play it and how you play it. A matchmaking system makes zero sense in M+ and rio is nothing like a matchmaking system.

1 Like

I think you are unfair here. There are plenty of people, who can read RIO properly, and we enter here into the “peoples problem” - there are also people, who expect always over-geared partners for their runs.

I think what you describe is people being people more than add-on being addon.

1 Like

Not to mention all the systems that revolve around MMR are not auto queue and you get to vet your partner in advance, see all their data, experience etc.

OK, I see, your “maths doesn’t make sense” was not about math. You cannot address math, you just think that I am wrong and you are right because (and here you restate something that has already been discussed at length). OK then. We disagree.

Maybe but does they know to read? Obviously its more easy to them to enforce discrimination, and mark you as rubbish than read.

I don’t think that’s remotely true. In League, OW, CS, Valorant etc. you just get matched with players with similar rating and that’s it. I guess you can dodge the game but that’s not really something that can be done regularly most of the time.

Ever heard of solo queue?

I have explained, no one is going to be measured on their first attempt of anything. Not even the incredibly skilled can do all content and never fail a single key. So your claim does not work.

You correctly explain what matchmaking systems do, then say that RIO shows a number, but then somehow pretend that people do not use that number as a guide for making groups and conclude that RIO is “nothing like matchmaking”. Dude, you yourself explained how RIO is used as a matchmaking system.

This thread is quite hilarious. :- ) Like you say, so many “big words” from you and others that actually make my point. Pity I don’t have any more time left today. Farewell.

RIO is BS.

I’m sorry we can’t comprehend your incredible maths knowledge and your amazing expertise in matchmaking design in a game content where matchmaking has no place to be. We are all just too stupid to understand you.

1 Like

I think they have always been like that. people I mean. I can start off telling stories from vanilla. Maybe you think good of people and think RIO ruined them, whereas I believe people were like this all-along. All the time. Like asking MC fgear for UBRS and asking ‘curve’ for hc raids. Or mythic ilevel for their HC raids.

I must give you credit for believing people been nice before. I have been ruined years ago. For me its no difference - RIO, Gearscore or ‘curve’ - same thing, different name. Hence I don’t PUG much these days.

Guns don’t kill people, as they say - people kill people. Gun does not have free will. People do. Hence RIO is not the bad one here, but people are. ban Rio, or not. People will always be people and find a way.

We’re talking World of Warcraft and I have no idea about most of those other games but in League you most certainly can see statistics. We are talking a different genre.

I don’t want to have to create a smurf account to help friends do keys because it would destroy my rating because they play at a lower level. It would also have a huge impact on communities for the same reason.

1 Like

Matchmaking systems measure performance, rio measures experience.

1 Like

Well, maybe if you weren’t so hell-bent on proving me wrong and actually thought about what I wrote, it’d have been different. :- )

But really, bye for now.

You don’t even have to want to help friends for that to be an issue, lol. I’ve been joining lower KR keys lately just because I want the mount from the last boss. I go in and do a normal mythic then I sign for lower KR keys in hope of getting the mount.

1 Like