First of all, you completly changed the point of my first quote, this was actually the point i made: “all I can see is you arguing with high rated people that played games at that rating, played more games this season and back up their claims by them being at that certain rating/games played THIS season as well as using logic”
which is, yes, super ignorant of you
Now, to your second point. If you tell the scientist that you think hes wrong because he made some points you dont understand, yet he has the title to also back up his claims, you might just not have the mental capabilities to understand what hes saying. The same way you cant tell a chess player why you should play this and this way against this certain tactic because that has been working at your level of competition but you would get totally smashed by a pro using your same tactic because he would be able to read that from what you are doing and get bent over. Same as in arena, if stuff you do and say you should do works at your 2k, it might not work at 2.5+ where people play completely different, then you just come here and start saying why the pro player played wrong and stuff even though you do not have any experience playing at his level.
To your third point now. I really dont checkpvp, I just saw your feats of strength, saw that you dont have duelist this season and not many games played, just having the rival title. Also, I see what the pattern you follow is now very clearly, trying to mislead my own quotes, lets see…I actually said: “you should at least have some games played this season, not be stuck below 2k and then talk to some people who argue against you that have more than 2.6k xp and have much better idea on how the game works, your skill capped claims that you always make are literally so misleading, the site says how the tier systems work as well.”
again, trying to mislead totally and not getting the point of my sentence and just quoting random words, I can do that too with you and quote things that had way different meaning to try to make you feel lost in your own arguments because of making you think you said some stuff which you never had on your mind. I dont do that, why? Because its cheap, ignorant and does not lead anywhere.
The last quote is funnily quoting me on 3 words, “when logic fails”. You took that out of the context again, not quoting myself for the third time here but lets think, where do you use your logic, where are you coming from in your arguments? You take stuff out of context and try to paint a picture for me to think I said some stuff I didnt, for some less observant people, it might work, it might be effective and they might think they are losing themselves in their arguments, because they in fact are. But is that all you need? Attention and feeling of winning an argument by using this misleading technique? This, my dear Whisperer, is in fact an informal fallacy and literally makes you a hypocrite, since you tried to tell me how I am just and only using these fallacies, while you did that all along.
- As a straw man argument, it involves quoting an opponent out of context in order to misrepresent their position (typically to make it seem more simplistic or extreme) in order to make it easier to refute. It is common in politics.
- As an appeal to authority, it involves quoting an authority on the subject out of context, in order to misrepresent that authority as supporting some position.
I think you are the one that failed.