WoW Housing: It’s Only Neighborly

Sometimes its just better to say the magic words you want to hear just to end this balagan…

You know, those polls…what does he think is the ratio between forum/social media using palyers and player count not interacting with those polls xD
Pretty useless poll at the end of the day :dracthyr_shrug:

1 Like

not really possible to get a better result, than to poll all accounts.
for sure better than this forum, we only have a handful of people here
and youtube comment section is not much better

besides, you can give in-game rewards for participation
a HS pack, a mount whatever

That and a poll alone is not a court warranted order which forces Blizzard do to X.
They can vote A = 90% yes and B = 10% yes and Blizz can still choose to do B if they wish. A poll’s result doesn’t suddenly “force blizzard to chose A” against their wills…
But nah. I had enough of this circus for 1 night, let somebody else try to explain that to him…if they dare. :rofl:

And thats provided if they actually present those results to the public. Can just claim “according to the poll, we will do B. Thank you”.

1 Like

so you are saying, that if 90% votes A and 10% B blizzard will do B?

Have a good and relaxing night :smiling_face:

1 Like

I dont know. Ask Blizzard if you want.
All I am saying that the poll is not court binding and Blizzard’s HQ wont be raided by the FBI because they decided to go with the minority.

But nah. Good night. I barely managed to explain to you(I think) the difference between mandatory and voluntary.
Sry got no strenght left to try explaining to you the difference between a judge signed order/warrant and some data. If you want to know the difference, then I can give you homework - one can land you jail for not following while the other you can ignore without any legal repercussions. I will see you tomorrow for your answer.

Like i explained, we are not discussing the law, the judges or the word mandatory here.
This is completely off topic

We are discussing, whether Blizzard took and L or not
I think, you did agree Blizzard did, and they should have done the poll on which zones to choose

We are on the same page
Thats perfect

i jsut personally think, that not giving a player a choice, be that in solo/mp issue, zone issue, race issue or utility/no utility issue - is always an L.
Not doing at least a poll, is obviously an L.

but yeah,
if you are to bed, then good night!

wont pay the same courtesy to nannexx, as all i heard from them was adhominem attacks, but thats ok, that happens when a person cant say anything else

At first I tried to keep up, now I’m just scrolling past the arguements.

@Tah on a re-read, I’m not sure the community so much picks what the neighbourhood looks like theme wise as they are saying collaboration is possible… more likely it will be a clowny mismatched horror show. If such a thing is possible. Don’t know the extent of it yet.

1 Like

And you are overestimating how those polls even work. If you think that if Blizzard had polled A = 90% B = 10% then God himself has mandated them to do A.
Thats now how feedback works. Blizzard…heck any company can adopt the feedback, they can change it then adopt or they can ignore it for whatever reason. Is it a good or bad idea to ignore feedback? Different question and also depends on the reason why they decline or ignore said feedback. You cant satisfy players every whim and want.

The only reason why i am bringing law examples are cause you seem to be confusing a court order and a feedback. If a judge says that you need to do A, then you bloody do it and nobody cares about your feelings on the matter.(or face the legal consequences if you dont) while feedback is just suggestion - free for Blizzard to chose to implant or ignore.
Something you seem to fail to comprehend and you believe that some poll data will make Blizzard submit to your every whim and bow to you…

P.s Just brushing dem teeth while on the phone.

Everything i wrote between 270-this post is reiteration, sorry about that, somewhat of a spam discussion, sorry.

again, nothing to do with the law and mandates
if blizzard knew 90% want for them to do another zone and still did elwynn+durotar, i would say
“why did not they do the 90% zone? thats an L”
Obviously
But they did not even bother to poll. which says a lot or at least which is something to think about
food for thought
altho, sorry, i know you have already brushed the teeth

We dont know the inner workings at Blizz. Could have been already working on elywn and dur for a while and felt it was waste of resources to scrap and start over.
Every decision they do they weight in gains and loses. Sometimes they make a decision which is a loss but a win at the same time cause alternative option could have caused even a bigger loss.
Not everything is rainbows and roses in a business. Sometimes you have to make decisions not which “gains the most” but which “loses the least”.

1 Like

well, they knew from WOD, that people are unhappy with no-zone-choice policy, so why did they begin working on elwynn and dur in the first place?
no, of course we dont know the inner workings. Maybe its 2 zones of 10 zones they planned, but now they need to pump out midnight fast, so they cant finish the rest, those 8 zones, and now we are stuck with 2.
Except, this already allegedly happened back in WOD, when additional zones got cut due to lack of time
So back to question 1.

No, i think, there is another reason behind blizzard only doing 2 zones
And its a good something to think about

But lets hope we are all wrong and blizzard will announce they are doing more zones, sp and mp, racial buildings, utility and more

But personally i would not expect that
Maybe one thing out of those they will do, maybe we will be wrong aabout one thing.

Anyway, in case you went to sleep, gn!

1 Like

I hope over time they’ll add more neighbor hoods, like one in gilneas. it’s been reclaimed, but currently it’s just pointless, and does nothing, there’s no real point going there, unless you want to watch worgen walk around and tell you to ‘‘get gabbin’ or get going’’ so it seems like a reasonable request to have gilneas themed homes as a neighbor hood in gilneas, for worgen, as who wouldnt want to live in their reclaimed city and stand definetly and say ‘this is ours, so get gabbing or get going’

2 Likes

The fairies got me. Imagine flagging cos you’re soft. Get me banned for a month, go for it! Guess what? I’ll be back and I’ll be worse than ever.

There is no good reason. Blizz just generally don’t do polls and the few times they do it’s done via forums so just a small part of the playerbase answers them. Even if they did a poll, most of us would probably end up displeased with the results anyways so why even bother.

Hey Blizzard, please don’t separate lands alliance and horde wise? Like, we got rid of faction barriers technically, and most of the story does not care about that as well, so why separate neighborhoods that way? C’mon. It’s so obvious.

It’s not really separated. You can buy a plot with one char of the opposite faction and use it with the other faction.

Would’ve been nicer/easier if we were to choose whatever we want’t to buy with whatever char we want to, but probably it’s because of the entrance location, I don’t know.

obviously, a forum poll or asking preach or whoever is the main youtuber they usually call into the office and ask to decide for the whole community - so what they do usually allegedly, that would be useless

BUT
if you send a message and then over several months several reminders to all accounts, that own wow
and also give good wow and hs in-game incentives, (mounts, mogs, card packs)
meaning, reward every account, that participated in the voting and elected 5,6,7 zones they would want a house in,
and then do housing in 3,4,maybe 5 zones most voted for -
you will probably cover most of wow players.

that is to say, most players will probably get at least one zone they voted for

why not?

1 Like

so far it seems there will be a MASSIVE difference between gated communities (charter and guild) versus looking for neighborhood communities.

1 Like