Diablo 5 Metacritic score

General Discussion PC
1

Now that Diablo 5 has been announced I was wondering why the Metacritic score is not 0.3.

Normally the haters would have already activated their crews and pushed the score way down.

3 Likes
2

LOL. Nothing was announced yet.

3

Because the people that rated Diablo 4 badly were being honest.

The real question is why have the people that love Diablo 4 not come to its aid and gotten that score higher?

3 Likes
4

We are talking about D5, not D4.

5

This is a Diablo 4 forum, keep your pointless conspiracy theories to yourself, you may have noticed you cannot rate Diablo 5 on Metacritic yet, you cannot even find Diablo 5 on Metacritic… are you seeing things again?

2 Likes
6

I think D5 is clearly 1.6/10 game due to lack of endgame, no story, no gameplay, no graphics, no soundrack. Game is literaly unplayable. Very lazy design. The only good thing that comes to mind is price. Perfect example of game that truly deserves 1/10 and only case where I would justify giving the lowest possible score.

1 Like
7

Some blizzard guy said that we wont have to wait that long on the next diablo game, and everyone is like: Diablo 5 annouced. LOL. They wont do diablo 5 for next 3 to 4 years, get real. Only thing he said we wont have to wait 12 years for next game.

8

im pretty sure IGN gave it a 8/10

1 Like
12

When company releases a good game it gets positive reviews,when company releases literal POS of a game,it gets negative reviews.

There’s no secret agendas about it. Why no one review bombed BG3 , PoE or LE? Only when blizzard releases POS games such as OW2 and D4 , its all about conspiracy theories.

1 Like
13

Most of the people who review bomb anything have not even played the game, watched the movie etc.

It’s herd mentality, not a conspiracy theory. It has been proven scientifically many times over

14

Just because it has been proven that review bombing exists does not mean that Diablo 4’s bad score is a product of review bombing.

Why did the bad reviews not start until multiple weeks after the games release? It’s because people were honestly trying to play the game and experience fun, it’s clear that it was a little bit fun for the first few weeks for many but that soon wore off.

Go and read the bad reviews of the game, the majority are totally relevant to the game.

15

I have read plenty of the reviews and there are a lot of ‘blizz suck’ and ‘diaBlows 4’ reviews.

You can’t take that seriously. Yet, the herd does.

Diablo 5 still has no 0.3 rating. Looks like the hater review bombers are failing.

16

Just because someone wanted to give the game a low rating and only said “Game Suxx” does not mean their review is not valid or that its a ‘review bomb’. I’ll ask again, why did it take so long for the ‘review bombers’ to attack Diablo 4? The answer is because it was not review bombing.

Although I have seen very few of those sorts of reviews, the majority write a review with reasons, valid reasons which are reflected all over the internet, here on the forum, reddit, youtube etc.

To many of us the game is so bad that it is hard to pinpoint specific feedback. The game does suck, simple.

And we are back to the Diablo 5 nonsense, that game is not out yet, it is not available to review.

I’m sure it will get a good review because the people that have enjoyed this franchise up to the point of D4’s release will likely not purchase or review D5.

17

thanks but no thanks fooled me once shame on you fooled twice shame on me, fooled me a third time - never gonna happen.