But don’t worry you can play a furry class for just $40 extra dollars on top of the $80 game cost.
No thanks guys, I’ll sit this one out.
But will you really sit out?
Seems today’s consumers don’t really back up what they say which makes the point of their protest pointless.
1 Like
Yeh, I actually will. Have no plan to play the expansion.
I enjoyed the initial game and feel like I’ve had my moneys worth.
But now it’s starting to feel repetitive with little real end-game to keep me interested 4 seasons in.
Add to that the new class just doesn’t interest me lore wise, the raid structure/mercs and the additional cost and yeh it’s not gonna do it for me. I want a gritty, hard hitting solo dungeon crawler and it just feels like this is moving towards mini wow.
I’ll wait 6 months maybe a year, the paladin will come out and maybe they will have added some extra content by then and fixed the classes / balanced skill damage a bit better etc and get the expansion on sale. That is, if I’m not too busy playing other stuff. But this expansion just isn’t exciting as it stands.
Yeah not having a sword and board class 1 expansion in is just… really bad. They decided to deviate from the formula that has proven to be successful over the last 24 years.
Did you ever seen Druid in diablo ?
u get wings, semi… how u gonna pass that up? it’s the fugly wings tho, ofc… so maybe u can skip these cause there’ll be actually cool ones later on.
but yea, it’s toolish; i know. don’t even want to play anymore and I’m still considering making the purchase just to pacify my massive fomo.
I agree, I definitely feel like they dropped the ball on this expansion class.
No one wanted a glaive wielding shaman. We already have kind of play style with the rogue and druid.
I do know the people wanted a crusader/paladin/knight class.
2 Likes
agree, but do you really want a paladin ? again ? 20 years of the same class again and again… Maybe a 100% new class playstyle can be good… But im not sure if Blizzard can do this … they just know how to copy/paste 
edit: im sur this new class cant be new they just copy/paste/mix something already exist
we got rogue, which is standard; so why not warrior? can go two-hand or shield and one-hand. Why it has to be some quirk? like rogue’s standard, basic class; barb’s not that, it’s a variation on warrior. Barb doesn’t work for me. neither does paladin. but warrior does.
You should worry about season 5, not season 6 where there will be at least this new mixed druid/rogue/necro class
I’m not that extremist like you but i also miss class where 1hand weapon and shield is playing a huge role …
It doesn’t have to be a paladin
it’s just i want to play some class where i can smack demons with my SHIELD
1 Like
Staff removed my comment because I disagreed with the expansion pricing and that they are not providing enough content to be worth 40e… Holy sh-t they actually silence people : fu :
1 Like
like me
2 posts deletes, idk why
1 Like
If you post like that only bring complains all the time and nothing constructive to the topic good to know why they are gone.
So you agree with the staff here that nobody should complain and discuss the matters and we should just nod our heads “yes master” style? alrighty.
2 Likes
I think that it’s unnecessary to have three or four threads running on the same topic. They’re probably reasoning like that as well.