I am not new. Just refusing to play meta.
Blizz sucks
1 Like
So let me check that I get this right.
You play a game where choosing the deck you play is supposed to be a large part of your chance of success.
You then deliberately choose to play decks that are not the best, so you deliberately choose to play with a lower chance of winning.
As a result of playing decks with a low win chance, against players who do not make that choice, you rarely win any more.
And then you blame the company that made the game.
What would have made you happier? A rigged RNG so that players who choose to play crappy decks still win? So much randomness in the game that it doesn’t make one iota of difference what deck you play and you still win 50% of the games?
2 Likes
https://i.imgflip.com/6q3r4n.jpgNot quite.
Atm you have like 20-30 high win rate net decks out there. If Blizz buffed underused cards which I am pretty sure got the way of checking which cards are the least played then you would have hundreds of reliable netdecks and everyone would of been kept happy.
But buffing a card by amount X makes it better against different cards by different amounts, so what you’re suggesting actually arbitrarily changes the amount of “playable” decks i.e. it could go up or down.
The only guarantee is if the buff is too good, that card will become the meta and previously playable cards get pushed out.
It’s incredibly hard to make as many things playable as possible and with the player base demanding nerfs as soon as possible we’ve got to the point where mistakes are being made due to the rush i.e. Edwin getting buffed only for it to turn out he was already good enough to be run in a rank 1 legend deck.
This game is full of losers. So many mages who ruining my fun.
Play quest hunter, I eat mages all day long nom nom nom