Galakrond is clearly a dragon, so should surely count as a dragon in hand for ‘if you are holding a dragon’ effects.
Not a minion so can’t be part of a tribe, which is what effects like that refer to.
Well you can sacrificial pact jaraxxus in hero form, so i still think it should count
Thats different becaus Jaraxus isnt a hero card
Hes a minion who replaces the hero through his battlecry
If galakrond would be the same, it would work.
Also dragonhunter would be the new meta tech card
This is actually quite a good point in yes that Jaraxxus is a minion which changes the hero, I think that they should change how Jaraxxus works and turn him into a hero card much like Galakrond, Jaina, Guldan, etc works.
No other “hero” card does this, I think Jaraxxus needs updating to work in the same aspect as the other Hero cards once again Blizzard fail on the “consistency” aspect.
Just need to look at cards to how inconsistent they can be :
This minion has “Rush”
This minion has “Charge, Cannot attack heroes on the turn it,s played”
Whats the difference?
Im aware of that.
Im also aware that jaraxus isnt a hero card.
They didnt fail consistency because they made something unique.
Jaraxus was out long before the first hero cards got printed
If you mean the Devilsaur by your example, it got printed before the keyword rush and again its unique because it can attack the hero through recruit or evelve mechianics etc.
Can also get juraxxas on the board as a 3/15.
Personally Juraxxas is so iconic to the game that it being unique is fine.
Your rush example is bad (literal otk combo decks built around your comparison). Y’sharrj (sp?) literally just recruits but you don’t mess with the old gods (was the official reason 
)
#MakeMajordomoExecutusGreatAgain 
1 Like