Placement fairness and plain problems


#1

Hi there, I would be interested in hearing about placement results, especially grossly inadequate placements.
Consider this: placement 6 wins - 4 losses, the 6 wins in a row as the last 6 games of the 10; placement result: bronze 5 - 0 rank points, the lowest possible. I had 2 MVPs in those games and scored pretty high, (and yes, I know of the MMR system; I see also how disastrously MMR is computed).
What do you think of such placements? It looks like placement result is a random function, if not a desired determined outcome for other purposes.
I would also add that the 4 first losses where “programmed”, the players in my teams were not normal human players as encountered on main season ranked, unranked, qm, and even vs AI.


#2

What do you mean they were programmed ? Detail a bit their behaviour.
Regarding your rank I believe they put you too low even if you played badly because the system counts wins as a condition first and foremost. You should have a drasticaly better result next season because there will be more matches under your belt.