Bring Nathanos and Sylvanas back

Nathanos’ only narrative role was simping for Sylvanas (Somehow even harder than her player fans), without his precious banshee queen to order him around, what’s left?

1 Like

Alliance has Vereesa, Alleria, Shandris and Khort.

Horde has Halduron and Rexxar. That is a big difference here. Only classes where our team has an NPC advantage is rogues and shamans.

And what have Shandris and Khort (Whoever that is…) done lately?

Sure, the Horde needs more representation (Well, anybody besides the damned Windrunners and Anduin do), but un-mothballing two characters people were sick and tired of by the time they were sidelined isn’t the way to do it.

A friend of Vol’jin from the Book Shadow of the Horde.

Hello? Official leader of the night elves until Tyrande is back?

These two are great and you are wrong.

Great argument. I’ll just give my own ‘great argument’ as a retort: No, you are wrong.

:person_facepalming:

Anyway…

Never even heard of that last one. I don’t agree that he/she counts as a notable hunter.

Anyway, if they’d be bringing back a hunter from the dead for the horde, I’d much rather see Huln Highmountain.

1 Like

Pls not …!

1 Like

A nobody then.

Yeah, but what has she done? (Except trauma-dumping in the Emerald dream zone.)

Counterpoint: They were overused to the point of obnoxiousness, and not that amazing even before that (Especially Nathanos, he was just a quest elite in the middle of nowhere), therefore you are wrong.

1 Like

True but for a sycophantic simp he was semi interesting

The wiki says otherwise.

Anyway…

You ignored my last point. Most classes are bar or any notable Horde presence even the warriors

Does it now? I quote:

Tyrathan Khort is a human hunter in the Alliance army, but not especially high ranking. He was found by Chen Stormstout after being injured in battle and brought to the Shado-Pan Monastery to heal, where the Shado-Pan had him care for the recovering Vol’jin so their opposite personalities would achieve balance. Tyrathan was haunted by doubt after losing his scouting squad to a sha attack in the Jade Forest. He and Vol’jin eventually become friends, even making a pact to kill whomever killed the other.

Sure sounds like he was a nobody.
Oh, and how did that pact go huh? Suppose Khort went to the broken shore to kill that demon? :joy:

I bet you love that theme of a human and a troll becoming friends. Alliance and Horde being friends. :grimacing:

I care about hunters and that’s what I’m responding to.
Your obsession with faction imbalance is not something I want to entertain.
For both our sanity.

PS: You ignored my mention of a far greater hunter than a nobody like this Khort or the simp known as Nathanos. Huln Highmountain.

Warrior.

Nathanos was literally chosen by Sylvanas herself.

It matters because the imbalance is real.

He is notable enough to make it on the article.

Walking corpses dont eat!

Horde has the rangers of Silvermoon still, sylvanas’ old squad.

Bringing back Sylvanas and Nathanos? No thanks.

1 Like

as long as people are giving attention and posting in it even if its a “weak bait “ . then its mission accomplished for erevien .

As much as I loved them both before Cataclysm, I think we should stop bringing back dead characters. (And, I do not agree with Arthas turned into anima, by the way. He should have just dwelled there with the rest. In fact, Shadowlands shouldn’t have happened, IMO.)

1 Like

I think most people can agree on that. :blush:

That’s why he wielded the survival hunter artifact weapon Talonclaw, I suppose?
:joy:

Oh boy.

And? Shall we start listing all the bad decisions she’s made? Mmmmh?

It doesn’t matter because there’s imbalance on both sides, but you refuse to acknowledge that. Always falling into the victim role and acting as if imbalance is something personal and unique to the Horde. It’s not.

Because he was featured in a book. I don’t think he even has an ingame model.
Stop dragging nonsense like this into it. Try to present your arguments in good faith for once!

I can’t remember we ever brought back dead characters before really. This would be a first time infact.

it isn’t about attention it is about getting rid of unfair faction imbalances.

If you retcon anything do it on BFA Shadowlands was fine.

He was a fierce fighter first. I never saw him taming animals.

She went against her own rangers to promote him.

Not here no. Most classes have an obvious alliance dominance.

Actually he was hiding in Durotar during the funreal and made a pact to the player that he will hunt down the demon that killed Vol’jin.

No.

Okay, so just your own head canon then. Check.

Not making your case any better. I just told you she made a lot of bad decisions and you go and prove my point.

And that’s part of your problem (your clinical obsession being the other). You are unable to look at the big picture. Things don’t exist in little vaccuums. Everything is connected and there’s an overal balance. :dracthyr_shrug:

Okay, okay hold up. Let’s get some things straight then…

  • He was mainly featured in a book where he befriended Vol’jin.
  • Ingame he’s only seen in a horde questline. Making a pact with a horde player character.

Dude… He’s a horde human hunter essentially. He counts as hunter representation for the horde! He’s literally never been seen doing anything for the alliance in the game.

That’s cleared up then.

most notable paladins? Humans. Especially folks like Arator and Turalyon.

most notable mages? mostly humans again especially Khadgar and Jaina.

Most notable druids? Almost all arch druids of the various totems are night elves. From Broll to Malfurion.

priests? See Tyrande and Velen.

Just because you refuse to see it doesn’t mean the imbalance doesn’t exist.

He was chosen because of his skills and because back then the Farstriders were a bit racist.

Yes. BFA ruined WOW.

Stop ignoring what I said:

You’re telling me as if I care. I really don’t.
I’ve never liked Nathanos. Sorry.

No. Shadowlands ruined WoW lore.
No single expansion ruined WoW as a whole. But here’s that obsession of yours again rearing its ugly head.

1 Like