I want to be an Asian inspired big boi, if only Blizzard would allow those grey/white transmog items… 10 years of waiting, since Starney (with another name) was born, as a big fluffy Pandaren… 
2 Likes
Nozdormu Elven shape, tattoos, facial hair, face shape and all, the whole enchilada would be nice to have
But just immagine the uproar… “asian elves” (ignoring Nozdormu Elven shape and the fact he had to take the idea from somwehere )
Remember whats happened after the dark skin was added? 
1 Like
i think i finally decided on a tattoo i want to get…
now i need to find a worthy artist.
EDIT: it both involves a symbol of infinity and broken time. 
1 Like
They really do need to add tattoos for everyone! They aren’t even an unknown thing in Azeroth because npcs have them.
Imagine kul tiran tattoos or goblin tattoos or forsaken tattoos
2 Likes
Yeah
I could immagine a few nice tattoos on the Draenei too 
The Dwarves have some tribal markings… but you could call them tattoos 
2 Likes
I loved the female version more 
especially the red eyes!
1 Like
dont be afraid. you know im a little… unconstant about mogs 
2 Likes
Tesla became a male?
1 Like
Orc mog best mog!
1 Like
this toon was always a female. so i wanted to try the male experience. But always forgot how lame are elf males figure.
2 Likes
i view them as pretty feminine tbh…
could just be me though that is why when i play bloodelf it is usually female.
1 Like
example my only bloodelf.
2 Likes
I used to play males back in the day but once I saw the belf ladies… I took a turn around, and never once stepped back. Who can resist those looks 
By the way, once I get home (probably next week - I got my personal number here in Finland at long last!!!), I wanna order a T-shirt with these commandments on it.
This is what alignment I would be in D&D… and it gave me an idea to make a good Friday thread after so long. Didn’t make any lately, since the previous food thread… had no ideas at all what to create next, that won’t be 404’d. 
Disclaimer: Dunkiee is Chaotic Good on the forums, if not Neutral Good. Don’t be surprised.
1 Like
number 10
kind of contradicts the whole thing…
i would say that is a more evil side thing, personal perspective.
there is a lot of dont do this unless it better urself in there…
neutral wouldnt care if it did or didnt better themselves… only evil care about that.
good would do it regardless…
evil only care and do things if it helps themselves.
my 2 cents
Edit: i vary based on who i am talking to and how they approach me … i can be good… all the way to chaotic evil if times call for it . 
1 Like
Actually, no.
Evil characters don’t care how they reach their goals, whereas Neutral characters try to not hurt others. They are both out for themselves however.
Unlike Good characters who are devoted to help the needy before helping themselves and would avoid taking lives if possible.
Of course, I do get where you come from. But as a generally loner person this code is more than alright for me. Avoid conflicts, don’t display extremes, work out small agreements or deals to advance, be fair and keep your word unless there is way too much at stake… it’s my cup of tea.
Couldn’t imagine myself neither as a person who’d incite chaos just for fun, nor a person at court who follows rules and laws to the letter, and the same goes for committing evil acts. Maybe would do good, but rather limit it to friends and family (and in D&D you’d be expected to help anyone, not just those you like anyways). 
1 Like
yes i think it is a matter of perspective, i think we grade neutral and evil differently based of how we perceive it personally.
irl i am heavily good… much to my own detriment i always help others even at the cost of harming myself…
on the forums i like to think i do the same… but as i said i vary based on if someone is conflicting with me or not…
if someone is approaching me in disagreement with a level head… i approach it in neutral…
however if they are just trolling in a attempt to spite me i throw it back at them in evil.
…
to me people focused on themselves and that being the only reason they would do good things… is evil.
but your views can be different and that is fine 
.
1 Like
take bobby kotick for example…
before all the alligations he didnt make any effort to make himself appear like he cared about any of topics which happened…
afterwards he was outwardly putting himself out to be some kind of saint on those topics…
that is chaotic evil…
1 Like
Well it’s alright
Basically, before I discovered these I thought the same, and never once guessed there is a middle zone. And actually, there is only problem is, as such an alignment tends to not take sides (is literally nicknamed as “Undecided”), they tend to get the roast from multiple sides.
“Why not follow the law!”
“Why not just kill them and take their stuff!”
“Why not disobey the orders!”
Things like that. 
so these can help you a lot to understand people. A corrupt politician is for instance, lawful evil, as they use their order for personal gain and cause a lot of harm to their underlings. You get the idea.
1 Like
i think neutral is the best place to be… and flip and flop between good and evil based on circumstance…
but always keeping neutral values at the heart of it.
so to never go chaotic in either good or evil.
2 Likes
…anyways! I’m up for some more moral debates, but as this is the food thread I shalt be Lawful Neutral for a short while to obey the foodie law:
Accept a cocktail, barát! 
1 Like