Ive seen tons and TONS of negative threads in the US forums.
They usually gets deleted fast.
Guild died almost instantly.
Friend list is empty and 90% of the people are back to classic.
A huge bunch of those who talk POSITIVELY ABOUT THIS EXPANSIONS FEATURES never has the “phanatical” achiviement, which is to collect a huge amount of phantasma in Torghast. They are never close. I always check their profiles when they talk great about Torghast.
Week-end threads are awesome
If you would be game director ? would you read this forums ? like be honest ?
I for one wouldn’t .
99% moaning , crying , confused players , ppl that can’t press 3 buttons , trolls etc
Constructive criticism it’s like less then 1% .
Ppl here can’t express what the issues are with the game , saying “you don’t like a feature” it’s not constructive criticism .
Basic stuff u don’t see on eu forums .
Also saw the same…person looks like he lives in a paralel universe…seen his interview and i just wanted to punch his face , for the awsome loot sys and borrow power he got us…
Not sure if you’re trolling, since their expansion system exists because they don’t have to be or get creative people anymore, so they don’t have to put in the money for a steady income. They want braindead standby games because it’s cheap and easier to keep an overview. Don’t believe me? Listen to the CEO of Activision Blizzard.
Also, I’d love to hear your examples about this team putting in effort into countering this philosophy (“changes addressing many, many things.”). Or are you talking about future number adjustments?
Regarding the story, I feel Anduin visually resembling the Lich King but caused by an immediately inflicted, outside corruption is cheap and its creativity pretty much on the level of a Mary Sue Sylvanas. Why? Hmm, let’s start by realizing it’s a world of Warcraft and not a Warcraft 3 Custom Campaign. Let me elaborate further, my son…
Forums is not representive for entire playerbase. You always see negative treads, because happy customers do not tend to spend time if they are happy or ok. Some does, but you see negative customers post more. That is at least what happens in real life. I think blizz read forum, but should they always listen to like 0,0000000000003 % of player base and in addition hereto the most negative ones?
Please back this up. Where are your sources? Or are you just full of bullshyte?
You do realize that banning rio will not change anything? People will simply find another “meter” to gauge applicants with. Almost no pug will invite anyone based on prettiest name or “who asked the nicest”.
They have stated that they are reading most posts…
he has no time to read posts …
he has a life …
ion the lier don’t read the forums this or the us one like all the dev team his only on 3rd party applications because their to scared to see the result of their incompetent game design by visiting the forums
Yes it will… its never been this bad until now
RIO is cancer of the game… theres golden players out there who never get a chance because of RIO…
Imagine thinking making money = caring
Short answer: No.
Long answer: Not really.
before rio in legion, there was something else, just like after rio, there will be something else. RIO is not of this game, its of its players, it, or its kind ain’t going nowhere unfortunatly
I was thinking the same thing. 
Why would he? It’s not his job to be our voice within the company.
How naive can somebody be to think that stuff will change with rio gone? Ban rio, they will check armory, ban that, will demand logs and so forth. Rio simply comes from the need to filter out applicants based on experience. Every key holder wants to find people who can prove they are experienced and done the previous content. Rio has its flawls(boosted peps and etc) but its still better than somebody simply saying that they are “good”.
And these “golden players” will continue to get declined if they can’t prove their experience. They won’t get invited cause you said that they are “good”.
Lawyers aren’t trained to lie tho
You are watching to much of TV drama.
Hmmm there is an argument to be had here. I can concede that the majority that are playing it are happy, however that is not the majority of its audience. The playerbase dropped in half since the release, so no the majority of players is not happy. Or would you argue that once you quit you are no longer to be considered a player, in that case even if the playerbase is down to 1 person the game is a succes because that one person is happy with it.
Not to lie directly, but they are trained to interpret facts and laws to benefit their client…