According to Dejarous, 0.1% = 8.6%.
pi = 4 ?
edit: Ok, let’s be a little bit more constructive, and less sarcastic.
Hero achievement is definitively not “top 0.1%” of the player base and it’s clearly not a… Come on… It’s very hot in there. Why must I have to explain this ?..
Of course not everyone is in M+, some enjoy questing or collecting flowers… We’re clearly talking, here, about people who enjoy M+ and want to push some keys at least to 20. That’s not +27.
So, according to some here, “if you want to do a +20 on all dungeons, you must be a warlock”. (I oversimplify, yes, but you said meta, and right now warlock is part of the meta).
I say : what you’re saying is like saying “if you want to complete the starting zone of the game (you know lvl 1-10 zone) you must be play the meta.”
There’s no more exageration in that statement than in what you said.
According to the thread title, it specifically states a “title”, that title goes to 0,1% of the top scores. The confusion you are feeling is because the “keystone hero” fos is at 3k. They are not the same thing.
I’m sorry this is so hard for you.
Yea. I’m sorry that it’s still as easy for you as usual to show everyone your personal issue with your self-worth.
If anything, OP makes even more sense with this.
Instead of a competition over what class is more meta, it would be a competition over which player is more dedicated. Sounds more interesting to me.
1 Like
So why didn’t you just say that instead of resorting to hyperbole and kneejerk reactions in the first place? Ironic that you do that then point the “personal issues” finger at me.
Personal issues, we all have em. Part of being persons. 
Do you know how to read, Dejarous ?
I also thought we were talking about the Tormented Hero Title or whatever the equivalent is for 9.2. Cryptic Hero?
Many more players have pushed to 3k score this time round because they gated the conduits behind them. It is easier to get 3k score than it is to clear the raid on Mythic.
We are talking about the title that is given to 0,1% of the playerbase, not 3k. Thats what the thread starter means anyway, it says “title” at the top.
Anyway, to end off here: It would be preferable if balance was better so that the gap between meta and non meta wasn’t so big (its huge). But every spec “can” do it, its just far easier with meta specs. Finally, as some have said here, using this title (top 0,1%) in the same sentence as “can’t complete the game” is a laughable comparison.
I’ll leave it there.
Or rather which player wants to have the easier time getting the title. If it was spec based I could go affliction now, do some 24-25s and have the title guaranteed, while on destro I’d barely have enough score with all 27s.
Not necessarily. I think you’d have more people going affliction aswell, just like you would. So it would be harder than you think. And destro, you’d probably have less people going for destro.
You could also think around the idea of getting carried by your meta class/spec to hero title, I guess. But many others would do that aswell. So…
There’s maybe a negative side to that proposition, though : if blizzard implemented it, maybe they’d regard class balance as even less of an issue because every spec would get their own “bracket/competition”.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.