Not true, in P1 Rogue and Warrior were in 1st/2nd place, MM Hunter was in 3rd place, just 2% lower DPS than the Warrior.
Nope, hunter was behind warrior, rogue, feral and ex-aequo with warlock, 4-5 place. Don’t try to argue, enjoy SS nerfs like you all enjoyed hunters nerfs.
Your turn.
5 Likes
Computer says no…
https ://sod.warcraftlogs.com/zone/statistics/2007#timespan=60
Blizz only nerf / buffed based on pvp experience. The only reason why retail has pve balance is because there is a split between those with different values / scaling.
Sad day for Boomies. Back to being the meme of Classic, the Oomkin. Their rightful place (i guess?).
I played Boomie in 2019 Classic and was planning to lvl my 25 to 40 but decided to go lock instead, expecting a nerf because of pvp. I made the right choice.
1 Like
Everything is still ahead for locks. People repeatedly complaining about locks in PvP, so “class ballance” likely will touch them sooner or later.
Find by yourself
2 Likes
Yea reached merciless gladiator with a hunter, glad I need to reroll one on SoD again 
i just got one shotted 3 times as a mage from raptor strike from full health in the stv event lol
Oh? What spec? Destro can’t pvp (cast times), affli dots do wet damage (50% of SP dots). My guess is Meta ruin searing pain spam + drain life? But i get crits at 400ish. Can’t be that bad / OP?
Yes, I see complaints mostly about meta rune. Blizzard won’t nerf the base vanilla talents, they nerfing runes. I’m playing lock also (meta lock) and I’ll be very surpised if with forum cries and blizzard’s attempts to prohibit every fun, meta rune won’t be nerfed somehow.
Hunters were 3rd in dps after scorpid nerf. And after BM rune nerf hunters were 4th in dps.
Melee Hunters need a bit of nerfing, but not how blizzard did with Starsurge
Do you have less than 600hp?
Technically, there is only 1 pure dps class left in Season of discovery.
Hunter. So that kinda makes it an obvious choice to give them top dps spot.
Any other class above hunter should simply be nerfed.
Ask yourself, why should a hybrid class outperform a pure dps class in dps?
3 Likes
Wait, was that you who wanted boomies getting nerfed? And now you defend the op hunters, how predictable. Nerfs are coming, take it like a man, I’ll laugh at your tears just like you did at boomies today. Good riddance.
3 Likes
Yes, I too think that the BM tree deserves more nerfs.
I don’t cry like you toxic people, over this or that class for a nerf.
I’m not like you.
On the other hand, I will show as much compassion and sympathy as you showed to the hunters in P1 for each nerf you suffer.
I’m looking forward to it, already starsurge, then what else?
And rest assured, a hunter is not afraid of being nerfed, he just tells himself that if he dares to surpass the mourner classes in terms of dps, it is certain that he will be nerfed, we are fatalistic.
World Of Waste Community.
1 Like
If you do that then Flanking Strike’s damage buff won’t proc and the Melee Specialist rune becomes pretty much useless and would have to be overhauled in its design completely.
Just nerf Raptor Strike’s damage if you equip this rune by 20% and see what happens first.
Wasn’t that in P2?
I don’t get this. I went over to Dun Garok in Hillsbrad to try and get a helmet and would barely squeak by taking on one of them and they were not lvl 40 elites.
So 1 weeks data back in January makes it the all-time accurate stat 
1 Like
What? Frustrated at being wrong?
Maybe you would have wanted to take the stats from the start of P1 when everyone was without equipment? And the warriors cried to do zero damage? Spoiler, it didn’t last, and the precise stats are those that come over time, not at the moment that suits us.
1 Like
yes i see that but for my view its bad game mechanic - crazy 1 button spam.