Warriors are more useful than warlocks in PvP atm, thats a fact. A group with a warrior will do far better than a group with a warlock instead. I’ve tried and I’ve seen the results for myself. Keep your head burried in the sand, seethe and cope some more
Warlocks at 60:
Talent - Emberstorm: Increases damage by Fire spells by 10%
Talent - Demonic Sacrifice (Imp) - Increases your Fire damage by 15%
Rune , Chest- Lake of Fire - Increases all Fire damage […] by 40% (15 sec)
Rune, Hands - Chaos Bolt - Fire spells pieace through absorbtion effects
Rune, Waist - Shadow and Flame - Crits increase Fire damage by 10% (10 sec)
Rune, Legs - Incinerate - Increase all Fire damage by 25% (15 sec)
(+ yet unknown Runes)
Enjoy!
BuTwArRiOrSsCalEBetTerThANanyThinGeLsE
We’ll see
Waes were really good in p1, but i guess zug brain cant remember that
Really good at being crowd controlled and edited by moderator from a safe distance by druids, hunters, mages and priests yes.
Where was the crying from warriors in previous iterations of vanilla where they were left untouched, despite topping every content?
Hey thats only half the classes, what about the other ones?
Well, when you are bad player i understand that you want to play class that is insanely op. But have you considered just stop being bad? War bas like 3 snare removals, start using your abilities
You mean the warrior that has every single consumable known to man, every single world buff, full bis, and a raid comp designed to benefit the warrior the most?
Warriors are:
-The weakest class to level
-The weakest class in solo farming
-The weakest class in solo WPVP
-The weakest class in solo BG queues
Every class in classic had a niche, even the meme specs, warriors niche was group related content.
Warriors being strong in group content makes perfect sense.
Watch these people in shambles next phase when we get recklessness (30 minute cool down that makes all your abilitys crit for those that don’t know)
The top 0.1% try hard parsers will pull insane numbers meanwhile the average warrior in a pickup group will be doing average numbers and people will still call for nerfs.
Can’t wait tbh.
I do not want to play a class that is insanely op.
In sod I will play my warrior and nothing else.
Please name those 3 abilitys in phase 1.
This is a temp game mode with phase. Every class needs to be as viable as possible in every phase. If that means buffing warriors now to get them on the same level then nerfing them in phase 3 to adjust it, then that’s fine.
People screaming about how a class will be better in 3/6 months time are just begging for this version of the games to die out before phase 4 even hits.
Insignia, warbringer, fap.
Yeah, you will play war and cry for him to be op. Cant you just ya know, live with it for 1 phase?
All of this is meaningless when we do low damage compared to other classes and have zero survivability
Oh so a trinket with 5 minute CD, an ability that was our only gap close in phase 1 and fap which you expect me to buy 100 for WSG spam.
Show me where I said I want warrior to be op. Nay I only want warriors to be viable BEFORE max level.
I did grind enough wsg to get exalted so I should know how strong we were phase 1.
Without a premade it was hell mainly cause lack of healers and better enemy comp granted.
With a premade it was… okayish.
Phase 2 pvp is a fiesta compared, thank God for stv event as an alternative.
Keep in mind that your avarage player was far worse in 2005.
Warriors have quite bit of survivability atm. And are quite important in group pvp.
Please name them, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
Again, you are bad player, just get better, you think other classes dont use faps? 5 min and what? 20s snare removal? How many do you need?
We both know what you mean by being viable.
If you dont have healer in group pvp then it will obviously suck. With him you were very good and needed in every group.
P2 pvp is fiesta for everyone, but wars are even low tier there i grant you that.
Defense stance
Shield wall
Ralllying cry
Enranged regen
Aoe Fear
Intervene