Instead of boost

[anon96065152]

Blizzard sure love ruining their own games

[Gilgå-pyrewood-village]

They don’t know how to make good games anymore. They still have super talented artists but game designers are just not good. They are systems lovers and e-sport wannabes. Not innovative and lacking on the rpg side of things. Everything is on maintainance mode nowadays. Just trying to capitalize on the glories of good old Blizzard North…

[Blobbers-dreadmist]

Bliz knows classic players have no friends

[Sorzza-heartstriker]

@anon96065152

RAF was in the original game.

No it wasn’t.

[Blobbers-dreadmist]

@Sorzza-heartstriker

@anon96065152

RAF was in the original game.

No it wasn’t.

I think he ment the original version of TBC, not Vanilla

[Nimerul-zandalar-tribe]

@Punyelf-draenor

My point is that people who end up RAFing themselves and you have a second account on follow, you can also do multiple characters with RAF. RAF earns Blizz plenty of money and it’s repeat business. I have self RAFed for all the mounts in Retail.

@Punyelf-draenor

The boost is a one off once per account deal.

RaF bonuses expire pretty soon though, don’t they? I think multibox-RaFing yourself to 58 would be more expensive than the paid boost.

Or they could put whatever other limitations on RaF.

I just think RaF has morally the same downsides as the paid boost, but can also be used for “good”.

[Zumbakumbo-tarren-mill]

Fresh servers and/or recruit a friend would be a much, much better alternative to 58 boosts.

[Punyelf-draenor (Punyelf)]

The benefits allowed you to level multiple sets of characters, but yes they could put greater limitations on it however I can’t help but feel that would kind of defeat the purpose.

[Edowar-sinstralis]

Recuit A Friend, that sounds good but with few limitation please!

eg:
Limited to group with +/- 5level difference
Limited to 1-58 bracket.
Limited to one character per account.
etc…

[Takaminara-shazzrah]

kekw
/10char

[Disperselol-tarren-mill]

Themproble
Is we dont want to level again in that classic wannabe hard content whos just booring yo fomall
Over again.

Is thet simple!

People who boost barely have any sdvantage.

They lm start at 58 with green gear, unstart at 60 with epics.

Ur achievemnts in classic are usless in tbc, accept that , grow up
And
Move on.

I played classic till 60 my lock.

Wont benolaying
Lock and dont want to level again 2 months.

Grow up elitist, is notnur game and inrepeat ur raids in blue gear dont
Matter in tbc.

Yea bro, hard content, tbc will take more skill than classic but than again classic elitist who ate against boost will
Find a way to ruin tbc classic also.

Its a friking game, also not ur elitist anyiboost game.

U sont
Like it, stay in classic- “its hardcore”

[anon96065152]

Yes it was

[Melrael-draenor]

Imagine wanting to bring in people to a game, that don’t seemingly want to play in the first place.

[Lorran-hydraxian-waterlords]

@Punyelf-draenor

The benefits allowed you to level multiple sets of characters

I disagree, in that with the boost you are not technically ‘levelling’ those characters, you are boosting them. Semantics perhaps, but to my way of thinking it’s a key difference.

[Sorzza-heartstriker]

@anon96065152

Yes it was

No, it wasn’t.

Vanilla TBC released in Jan. 2007.
RAF was announced in Aug. 2008, shortly before WotLK released.

[Gvstoned-argent-dawn (Gvstoned)]

You don’t get the point and that’s okay. Just move along then.

[anon96065152]

Which is still TBC

[Sorzza-heartstriker]

@anon96065152

Which is still TBC

So is SWP, should we have that from day1 as well?

[anon96065152]

I dont know what SWP is

[Sorzza-heartstriker]

@anon96065152

I dont know what SWP is

Then google it