Microsoft lays off 1,900 Activision Blizzard and Xbox employees / Blizzard president Mike Ybarra has also decided to leave, and Blizzard’s survival game has been canceled

Community General Discussion
85

From what I read they stated it wasn’t an MMO, but a completely different thing(later I “heard” FPS, but not sure if I read that part from an official source.)

But yeah, I think the estimated release time also very much matched OW, but I never cared to store the links to these things. I just saved in in my head, and eventually concluded for myself that Titan was actually OW. It’s completely unimportant though, so not something I’m gonna argue with anyone. There is no evidence of anything, as far as I know. Just all theories.

86

It can sit on the vault shelf next to SC: Ghost

87

This is what always happens after a takeover.

At most companies some walloper who does nothing all day gets promoted by a different walloper who does nothing all day and they then promote all their pals, who do nothing all day.

After the company is bought the new owner thinks “wth is going on here why are so many people just goofing all day?” and they swing the axe.

88

I hope you are right. I love the warcraft universe.

2 Likes
89

Titan was the project name for a cancelled Blizzard Entertainment massively multiplayer online game. With speculation regarding the game beginning in 2007, Blizzard revealed little information besides that it would be completely new and not be based on the company’s then-current three main franchises.

The game was internally canceled by Blizzard in May 2013, though publicly they announced that the project would be delayed as they took the title in a different direction.[1][2] Its official cancellation was made in September 2014.[3] Internally, about forty members of the Titan project used the developed assets to craft a new game which became Overwatch.[4]

I remember all the info about it was about a new MMO but with more of a space scifi theme. Little was known until it was cancelled.

1 Like
90

“Diversity people” are hires to only showcase the company cares about inclusivity etc. who don’t have a real purpose other than to portray the company in a certain light to the world and stakeholders.

For example, many IT corporations have hire targets for 30% women and many women are hired so that managers can reach their KPIs but then turn out to be insufficiently qualified and get special “roles” to justify their existence.

Usually such people are cut first. And of course, duplicated roles and operational staff.

Engineers are rarely cut, usually just reassigned to different projects.

1 Like
91

Yes but 2k people, number too high to pertain only to the marketing and human resources.

1 Like
92

Asmongold followers.

3 Likes
93

Nope, not even occasional.

94

There was always going to be cost cutting, it always happens with mergers, happened in my job too.

Sorry for the employees but cant say i am unhappy to see Mike go, really lost faith in him when he promoted gold boosting in the game, that said i find it odd that he is going given he was from Microsoft which i find really strange to be honest, i didn’t expect that at all.

Who knows this could be a good thing, wow could really be worked on properly not given 2nd class status to every other new vanity project. Last few WoW expansions have been poor in my opinion, i just hope that next expansion wont be bad :grimacing:

95

Which ironically makes the entire situation even worse, because instead of “equal hiring” they are not hired for their qualities but to use them for a reputation boost. That’s like buying a certain breed of horses from the local peasant in the Renaissance era as a monarch and claiming “I support the common people”.

2 Likes
97

I’d rather not imagine Bobby Kotick, thank you very much

1 Like
98

uuuu years i never read that name. he’s still around?

2 Likes
99

Pretty sure I read from their official sources that titan would not be an MMORPG, but I never saved the sources or remember which point in time this was said, so might have been after 2013 then(?). This is linked from wikipedia, not Blizzard themselves, but I didn’t dig into every detail of your link. I might later, but atm fighting a mild but annoying headache, so no brain exercises for me atm!

100

Whenever a merger happens, an efficiency list is made and people are culled based on it. It’s not uncommon, it’s just sad for people that has to go.

1 Like
101

Yeah, hes still around but about as relevant to the game as i am tne the RWF…

2 Likes
102

Titan is very much an odd one. They tried to make a “real-world superhero MMORPG”, which implies a very large amount of content, using a team that was basically the leftover after Team 1 (WoW vanilla, early BC, SC2) and Team 2 (WoW WotLK onward) had been filled. And then they lost people yet again to D3.

From what I understand, using the limited insider knowledge I had, it was actually not that the projects took a long time to make. SC2 for example took 4 years, which is a perfectly reasonable amount of time for an effort its size. The issue was that there kept being interference and corporate restructuring happening at the ABK level, repeatedly cancelling one project after another.

The projects that survived were designed to not just be able to sell at a big AAA price, but also to make a continuous stream of money through low effort sales after that.

Further SC2 development was canned because making campaigns was deemed expensive, Warcraft 3 co-op in SC2 was canned, the StarCraft FPS was canned, HotS was canned at its first sign of weakness, and many more projects besides. The things they did release were profitable, but they couldn’t stand up to the mountain of cash Blizzard was pulling in from WoW, and so they were demmed not worthy.

And I honestly think the RMAH was a requisite Blizzard had to accept to even be permitted to make D3.

Projects were just being swatted like flies, one. after. the. other.
From our perspective of course, it looks like no work is being done or that things just take really long.

In any case, with Microsoft at the helm I figured things might change. Microsoft has done well by Age of Empires, for example. I think it’s too early to fully conclude anything, but I am not pleased. Feels like more of the same.

And to anyone who thinks Microsoft is going to do anything about the “woke” stuff - get real. Microsoft’s presentations literally have pronouns on them.

103

You are, they wanted King, and stated as such.

105

Ahh well. Potaeto potaato, as they say.

106
1 Like