Its not the worst healer in RSS.Hpriest is the one.Rsham by stats is below Rdruid also.Dont overdramatize.You just got used to be on the Dpriest/Hpala spot before TWW.Now you are in the middle of the pack.
1 Like
Thatâs not even the point of Rdruid at the moment.
Itâs literally all about how you have to press 5 times the buttons and waste globals for less results.
If you atleast had a smooth gameplay , it would be more acceptable to be the second to worst healer. But Druid playing awkwardly + being weak is a bad mix
They were in that state, like every healer in the game, even holy priest.
Just as any other class that is the meta in the current game design - affli meta is ridiculous, DK even worse, warriors - easiest melee to play and the strongest one, each time when some class is broken that even some degenerate with a broken PS4 controller can pick the class and steam roll it is insufferable.
I have asked this before never got answer. When last time rdruid was S+++?
In DF I remember DPriests pumping, but I took off from wow some times.
Last season in every bracket (even PvE).
Seems its true. No more questions then :d
Thanks
1800: 2800 Heal Priests vs 900 heal druids
2100: 1200 hpriest Vs 530 druids
2400 : 91 Priest Vs 63 druids
Had to check some old posts. But seems like priest was more played than Druid.
Probably still Druid the S tier or ?
Only thing Druid had was that at the top 0,01% it started to overtake priests.
But that was probably just this one guy on his 10 druids lol
Always enjoy facing a specc on my level and dont have too pull AWC plays too win a round
First google search said rdruid Stier, but I somehow donât remember rdruids being so OP :d
Nah.
Resto druid is another level.
Even now theyâre too strong and win games they shouldnât just by going rake â cyclone.
You shouldnât win by opening with rake â cyclone. Yet they do it all the time because people donât interrupt the cyclone.
Having to trinket a cyclone in the opener just means youâre gonna lose later.
Imagine how much resto druids would cry if holy priests could stealth up to them and open up with chastise â fear.
No other healer has a CC thatâs undispellable and doesnât break on damage and is spammable.
Painfully delusional. Must be very embarrassing to lose against resto druid in front of 4 dps players
Ah yes, I remember that you compared the sum of holys and discs and compared that to rdruid instead of comparing disc with rdruid or holy with rdruid. And even the sum of both specs fell behind rdruids at higher ratings, thatâs when you started to argue that the game should be balanced around 1800 
Can you change your cassette? Its goes on repeat for ages already.
Play rdruid if its so OP.
I play rdruid and holy, I would swap cyclone for chastise (dps spam reduce cd )+ aoe fear + mind control + roots any day.
I have played it. ITâs still op.
R1 yet? Keep cloning those peasants, thats all you need.
The spec just isnât balanceable. It has one of the most overloaded toolkits in the game, easily rivalling that of Mages, Rogues and Demonology Warlocks.
If itâs allowed to output competitive healing it instantly becomes the best healer in the game in all small-scale content (including M+). If itâs undertuned, HoTs become worthless and suddenly itâs unplayable.
People hate Resto Druids because whenever itâs viable the arena experience quickly devolves into orange man rolling 3 HoTs on the kill target while endlessly spamming out CC on 3-4 separate DR categories; 3 of which have no CD. Where interrupting them is a mild inconvenience at best, and where all of the original counterplay around healing over time mechanics has been designed out of the spec.
You do the math, split it in anyway 50:50 , 70:30 and it will still have priest dominating.
But oh no at the top 0,001% Druid was even with holy priest in numbers. That shows it
First of all, the playerbase above 2400 is bigger than 0,01%.
And when you have 2800 priests above 1800 and 91 of them got above 2400 you have a glad success rate of 3,25%. Meanwhile from 900 druids above 1800 there are 63 who reached glad, thatâs a rate of 7%, more than double as high as priest.
You canât compare the absolute number of specs with each other when one spec is far more popular than the other (and yes, 1800 isnât difficult to reach, especially at the end of the season, having 3x more priests above 1800 than rdruids only means that the former class is far more popular). Your approach would only punish popular specs and overbuff unpopular ones.
Holy priest was op in the first few weeks but they nerfed the damage of their main damage ability holy fire by 20% pretty quickly and also nerfed their stun cdr which also resulted in being able to press holy fire less often. At the same patch they buffed rdru damage by 80% which resulted in resto druid being broken for the rest of the season and they never adjusted it before pre patch.
Weâre making up the wildest statistics now huh
Im not brilliant at maths, but those numbers dont add up :d