You claimed that Lenin was a mass murdered, provide me with proof of that.
You claimed to even know who Democritus was - yet you havent even read History of Western Philosophy by Bertrand Russell…
Perhaps, you need to get educated.
i told u check “red terror” i believe u can find this on wikipedia
assumption isnt a fact,dont talk about philosophy if u dont know anything about disscussion…
it backfired on u already…
and here u are attacking personally without argument AGAIN
2 Likes
So you are getting your "facts from Wikipedia? Yeah, this is why it is pointless to have a discussion with you right wing people. Trumps Twitters are also the ineffable truth amaright?
I’m not the one hasn’t even read up on the things that I’m actually talking about. That is you.
oh so u attack wikipedia now because u dont want to admit how wrong u were hahaha so typical
what he has to do with history and what i say? u bringed right wing politician from other continent for?..
yet is still dont see logical arguments or thinking process on your side but only ignorance and attacks based on some weird assumptions…
that makes me rly sad
I’m not sure if you know this one thing, but I can edit Wikipedia - anyone can…
That is why its not a great source to fetch the facts from - right?
Like I said, read the book and we can have a discussion after - please tell me what in Democritus view on politics would have made you think that it would have leaned to the right (I know there is nothing, but indulge me). How do I know this, since his thoughts are that of exactly mine, someone on the left - the opposite to the right mind you.
1 Like
ever heard u can check sources on viki?i see u dont want to actually understand something but u are looking for brainless sheeps who will just nod to u…
talking about modern politics in regard to ancient philosphers is like talking about countries in medieval,u just cant understand socialpolitical state of various ancient greek polis.
about philosphy u cant learn it from one book,its disgusting that someone think in so narrow way
right? where u got this assumption from? as there is nothing that shows that in what i’ve wrote,again u dont think but act based on what u believe is truth…
how u even dare to compare yourself to someone like him 
im sure claiming that someone represent certain view is easy so long after that person death
You do know that a philosopher can have strict views on politics, that are not in a philosophical term right? You seem too branded, basically what I expect from a right wing.
Keep getting your facts from twitter/wiki 
At least I have studied his life - his work, unlike you.
And indeed it must break your heart that even the most intelligent man who ever lived would have told you - that you are a moron.
assumption isnt fact x10000(maybe now u will understand simple thing)
i dont sit on twitter…
and wikipedia is better source then ur brain
and again personal atack on assumption u are delusional lol
u base everything on one assumption without prove xD
think im done with wasting time on u and ur mass murderers idols
So why should I believe you then, it’s just your word (and strongly biased too)
If i don’t see it I don’t believe it.
Saint Thomas
I mean obviously they don’t. Just read this thread.
She has personal services to sell on her VIP channel !! While pregnant …
…and? 
1 Like
Least Wikipedia is more credible than someone’s twitter posts I have seen posted around here on forums 
Don’t hate Wiki, mon.
You don’t have to, its entirely my empirical evidence, I mean thats what Empirical evidence is, something that one knows to be true because they witnessed or sensed it themselves. I could say I have a phobia of wasps, and equally I have no -proof- to make you believe me when I say that, though I know this is 100% truth. The same is true of what I am stating, I was there when it happened, I -know- it happened, but I didn’t record it. I can’t prove it.
What -is- proven is that he has form for doing what I describe, we -do- have that evidence, as has been linked. As indeed they have recorded themselves doing it and encouraging it. Because of that, this shifted what I am saying from “Just some bloke saying he did it” to “We know he -has- done it elsewhere, and boasted of it, so he probably -did- do it”
It’s Empirical evidence, sure, but it is backed up by the person themselves confirming that they get up to said antics.
I’m not interested in those Empirwhatsoever sry.
Thats a weird claim to make, when every living human being with cognitive functions relies on Empirical evidence to some greater or lesser degree. How do you function? I mean even children do it “Ouch, Fire is Hot and hurts” That is Empirical knowledge. “I Don’t like the taste of Peanut Butter” “I personally do not agree with what I have just read so will say I’m not interested in it sry”
You can not be interested in it. Doesn’t mean you don’t experience and use it every conscious day of your life…
If I want to be leactured I would go back on school
Never do that. I would hate doing that. I can’t even remember how long multiplication and long division work…But then to be fair, when I was at school we still used to get free milk each day…
1 Like
Funny how you make such a big fuzz about everyone has a voice after you completely butchered that hong kong incident Blizzard, and now you further do the opposite and even cave into cancel culture.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.