Curiously, it wasn’t me the one that brought parallels between Taurajo and that random dead orc.
And certainly didn’t give it such importance. How that came to be? Looks like some strawman taken out of context to portray a caricature of some other argument that focus elsewhere.
Really think that? I mean, there are several threads that go into some very specific details that dissect even the mildest act carried out in Brennadam (to name an example).
But saying nobody gives a crap about what Sylvanas does or orders, kind of falls short when taking a look at the previous threads that dissected all or any Horde action that took place previously.
Including Brennadam, yes.
More Jaina bias here. The entire Warbringer introduction was either a Lie or got discharged last minute. Nothing new from Blizzard. They whitewashed events and characters before.
But saying that people don’t care about whatever Sylvanas does, doesn’t really add with all those threads and posts created expressively to complain about her actions.
And saying these sort of acts would’ve been seen normally even if coming from Sylvanas is being blatantly dishonest.
There has been debate and discussion for far less whenever her character is involved in ANY mildly controversial act.
So you are saying that, had been Sylvanas the one given this flavour detail, nobody would’ve batted an eye?
I mean, I’ve read guys arguing about what an evil person Sylvanas is for leaving in a ship with Ashvane and leaving Rexxar and Valtrois behind…
They did with punctual acts of cruelty in Brennadam. Or to name a more precise example, how evil the Horde is for using a stitched abomination made of Stormsong soldiers.
I mean, I despise name calling, but you can be damned sure there were a few that argued about it.
If Sylvanas was the one that pulled this, people would complain.