Viable Yes But dh/dk/rog/ww je better by far
Ret+Warrior was a good comp in the past, dont know how viable it is right now but probably still your best shot.
You still need that excuse so you dont feel bad being hard stucked at 1.8? 
Can just repeat what Joe said âWarrior can be frustrating in 2s but its very strong and fun in 3s.â So I would imagine that includes warrior to S tier in 3s.
1 Like
Link your main pls
I dont have something like a main, just a few classes I play from time to time. And with none of them I was ever hard stucked in the rat league. 
No balls anyway
2 Likes
Comes from the one who should actually be ashamed posting with his char. But if you need so hardly a profile of someone saying warrior is very strong, check out Joeférnandés on Sylvanas.
Finally i had enough ignoreing u little 1.5k piece of dogsheet
Joe also plays assassa, ret and WW 
Probably also one of the most experienced warrior players?
Warrior will be ubermens if the other melees get nerfed. I personally find it stronger than DK now, and itâll be stronger than DH, assassa and WW on the first nerf they receive. But until then, warrior still lacks behind, though not far⊠in 3s of course
He does not. He plays Warrior, Enhancer/Ele, Mage and WW. And yes, he is one of the most experienced warrior players, blizzcon champion etc. So if he is saying Warrior is strong and fun in 3s, who are you to question that?
And what does that change? I didnt take you serious from the first minute you told me that warrior isnt a good class and for someone hard stucked like you I would be careful with rating flames. 
âŠI did not?
Doesnt sound like you agree that he is in the S tier like the rest (except for rogue of course which is in another league).
IDK DK got nerfed like 4 times in a row, I barely see any DKs when playing at around 2k atm. I see a f1ckton of DH/rogue though. Warrior seems better pressure than DK atm idk (in 2s).
Youâre right, I do not agree warrior is in S-tier. Thatâs not what you claimed Joe said either. I think warrior is A-tier or A+ -tier, aka still strong.
âWarrior can be frustrating in 2s, but he is super fun and very strong in 3s.â
For me that includes warrior to S tier in 3s. Otherwise he would have excluded that or only said strong, or something like that. But he hasnt limited it in any way.
The moment he said that he was very close to 2.6 within the top20 of the ladder. Was a few days ago and if I remember correctly it was an answer to venruki who was in his stream âWarrior seems strong rn!â
So
Fun = Strong ???
I think A-tier is strong as well, but youâd label warrior in the same bracket as assassa, WW and DH.
Fun is just subjective, it doesnât determine how strong something is, they donât go up in tiers because of that.
1 Like
And no, I dont label warrior into the same bracket like assa, nor any other melee. Assa is in its own league. But I set Warrior onto the same level like WW, DK, etc. Not in 2s, but in 3s. So does Joe obviously.
I quote you here
So you do believe that when a class is fun itâs automatically stronger as well?
Bruh you push warrior into your own S-tier list and then the rest into S+ -tier just so warrior seems stronger? XD
How is that any different than me calling warrior out to be A/A+ -tier and the rest, minus DK, S-tier?
Thatâs an assumption youâre basing on him speaking a line about warrior seeming strong. A-tier is also strong, itâs just not god mode.
Not necessarily, but if someone is saying itâs fun and very strong, I would guess that is exactly what he means. Super fun and very strong.
No. Iâm just seeing Rogue ahead of everything else, but warrior on the same level like DK, WW, et cetera, like I have written it.
Because that means exactly that. Rogue > any other melee (in my opinion).
And you are assuming that he doesnt mean that. So why is my assumption wrong and yours correct especially since he literally said very strong? Would you call warrior very strong if you didnt think he belongs also to the S tier? And dont forget, we are not talking about a 2k player or something, we are talking about the a blizzcon champion competing at the top of the ladder, who used this description. Try to answer objective without any bias!
Because youâre assuming that because this 1 guy, who admittedly is one of the best warrior players, says he finds the spec very fun and strong, it automatically means itâs an S-tier class. Thatâs your assumption.
Iâm saying you canât jump to conclusions based on that, itâs not assuming anything from my side.
Yeah actually, I like to call that tier A+ tier, which is where you often place classes/characters when theyâre very strong, but not as strong as the strongest. This applies to any game really.
Agreed, but we also have players that are in close proximity to that level, who claim something else. Namely Tom, Magnus and Hayne.
I do, but you seem to take disagreement as bias. Ever considered you could be biased as well towards warriors?
Well, if you dont know for sure but saying at the same time its just my assumption, arent you assuming then as well? You are saying that its just my assumption, but my assumption could be correct. So you are just assuming or not? 
But what classes are the strongest? Who decide what S-tier and A-tier is? You? For me Rogue is above all other melees and warrior on the same level like DK, DH, WW, et cetera in 3s. Not talking about 2s.
Cant remember any of those have won a blizzcon? Cant even remember I have read one of those names before Legion. Also havent seen Tom since a while in here.
You dont. You already judged by our own experience, but that isnt objective. 
And I am maybe also biased, but Im not writing what I think about warriors, Im just repeating what a blizzcon champion and 3.4k xpd warrior is thinking about his class a few days ago.
P. S.: If you ask ordinary people what very rich means, you get answers that are starting with a few million up to a hundred million or something. But if you ask a guy like Bill Gates the answer will probably start somewhere in the billion. Thats why I said we are not talking about a 2k player but a blizzcon champion. If he says warrior is very strong (not just strong but very strong!), it means something I would assume!