well i scrolled through the post a lil and saw u makind 3s statements to a feral that only plays 2s. after reading the first part of triips last post seems he got it the same way. mhm.
actually not. because my argument that players spread on multiple speccs if they are all good is also true for 3s.
what do you think happens if outlaw gets nerfed to the ground? u think all outlaws will start playing feral or warr or w/e? most likely they will play one of the other good rogue speccs.
u cant just seperate them all from another. they are all melee speccs of the same class and all of them are good.
its obvious what he meant. u just twist things so they fit ur agenda.
its the same as u saying that we need to look at heal priest speccs when talkin about priest represenation from a sp point of view. thats worth a clown emoji but ill let u use those.
Same thing youâre doing right now? âRogues are everywhereâ is factually a different argument to ârogues are everywhere in 2v2â.
Go and read the thread, understand the point of the argument and then come back to me. I believe in you.
And similarly to Triip, you also didnât read my original stance and then came in with an irrelevant argument. Triip even said that Iâm arguing that Ferals are superior to Outlaw, which I have already admitted 2-3 times is not true before he even said that. Only thing youâre showing here is that youâre both as dense as each other.
the thing is u make a statement about 3s and then think all other responses have to match that bracket. i can make a 2s statement if the same logic aplies to 3s.
what do you think would all these assa and sub rogues on the 3s ladder beyond 2k play if the speccs were nerfed to the ground? feral? no most of them would play outlaw because its as well a melee specc of the same class. thats why u cant seperate the speccs completetly from one another when it comes to represenation. but im repeating myself.
ok. that coming from the one insulting others and using emojis?
Your response to someone saying ârogues are everywhereâ is to spout misleading 3v3 stats. Then you deflect every reply later on by repeating âim talking about 3v3 lul plsâ. I posted less misleading stats, showing that there are clearly way more rogues than ferals in both brackets - which is fitting, cos he said ârogues are everywhereâ. So I linked stats pertaining to everywhere, unlike you who cherry-pick to fit your deflection narrative.
Yes, it was. Not always at the same level as mw, but for most of the season it had similar rep to mw and pala. Either way a few % differences are irrelevant here, the point is disc rep skyrocketed when holy got nerfed, when nothing changed about the spec. Disc was alright last season, just not quite on holy level. The same thing applies to rogue specs atm, where theyâre distributed somewhat evenly since all of them are so good. The same thing doesnt apply to feral. You cant judge feral viability based on the state of resto and moonkin.
Misleading stats that only tell half the story (most likely less). Youâre making an irrelevant comparison. That being said, like Ive stated before: yes, feral is a very good spec atm - just not on rogue level if you look at both brackets.
Well, sadly this was quite revealing for you. After going on and on about others being uninformed, this was a prime example of someone who doesnt have a slight clue what theyâre talking about. On my main (or rather: highest character, which happens to be my alt atm) I have only played jungle for about 100 games in the start of this season and in the beginning of s1. For the overwhelming majority of shadowlands - and any prior expansion where I played priest - I have almost never played jungle. My highest rating in each season of SL has been as fmp. So yeaâŚLOL
Yes yes, ârating doesnt matter. Thereâs no difference from the rating Im playing and upwards, only luck. I would be 4k if I didnt play with lfg â
Maybe thats what you should tell your forum victims.
Another prime example. The guys I played jungle with when you faced me this season I have never played with before. Well, Ive played fmp with the feral at the end of last season, but never met the hunter until this season. I dont play with the hunter anymore. But thanks for confirming your absolute lack of valid information.
If youâre going to say ârogues are everywhereâ then that means both brackets. The facts are that Ferals are played more in both brackets than any Rogue spec. Ergo, if âRogues are everywhereâ, then so are Ferals. Say âRogues are everywhere in 2v2â if you want to be more accurate. Itâs not hard.
Breaking news: when you combine the numbers of 3 DPS specialisations to the numbers of 1, there are in fact more of the class that has 3 specialisations.
The stats and the facts are that Ferals are played more than any Rogue spec. Applying this to rating, only Outlaw rogue is played higher by 1 player than Feral Druid. There is nothing misleading about this. If Rogues are everywhere, i.e in both brackets, then so are Feral Druids.
I donât care what you got your rating as. I have beaten you every time whether it was FMP or Jungle, conveniently when youâre always with the same players. I imagine you and your lasting friends strategising on Discord whilst me and my LFG homies are winning and vibing.
Did you at least manage to create a lasting friendship with your pleasant personality?
I donât think I lost any argument (1 E) to a DK that thinks Dispersion is as skilless as Spellwarden.
If you havenât bought it, then yes it clearly does. Your transmog is not prestigious when you didnât even earn it through the original means and have bought it with gold on an auction house 14 years later.
â
