Current state of meta

I was going to let it go but to be honest, I find this quite amusing…

jokkepappa questioned the math ability of Blizzard staff with an example that shows his lack of basic probability theory. The whole sentence, when observed from a mathematical framework, is nonsense. However you find that happening “in a row” is key to the concept of what he was saying.

Something as mathematical irrelevant as the fact that there were three events in a row, suddenly change the nonsense concept that Blizzard staff can’t get probabilities straight.

I am not sure what you expected from me, mate, I honestly don’t. If you had said that I could have explained it differently, without tongue in cheek, I would probably agree with you. But I can’t really see what is it that you expect to be different by commenting that what I wrote should observe some “key” point of utter nonsense.

1 Like

This is where you go wrong. I just didn’t say that.

Without lending his question any validity, his example makes sense, you just seem to have difficulties grasping it.

You say he’s talking nonsense for no reason because you are simply talking about something different. You’re right, but it’s not what he’s talking about. Apples and pears.

Do you see? Is it clear now?

Every time I read a dismissive post, I can’t help but wonder why. It’s a discussion forum. If you’re not open to discussing a certain idea or opinion, just leave it, it’s not for you then.