Thank you for those kind words.
Instead of replying to individual parts of your response, I’ve tried to formulate my response in a way that encapsulates most of the relevant themes.
Please consider the following scenario:
An anti-roper reports a roper to the authorities. A trial is being held. The roper sits at the defender stand. After the trial procedures, he has to be found not guilty by the jury since no laws have been broken. This means that the accuser, the anti-roper has to pay all damages and cost of the trial to the defendant.
Let’s take a look at thread starter @Benzy’s case:
“Tonight alone, I have faced approximately 10 people that spend their turn doing nothing until the last moment, where they press ‘end turn’ just before the timer runs out, so they can waste yet another full turn the next time round.”
Objection: Speculation
“But on ladder, ranked games, particularly rank gold and above, players typically know what they’re doing, and a player that ropes 3 turns in a row before turn 5 is more often than not, simply wasting time for their own amusement.”
Objection: Speculation
“No one is perfect. But, and I’m sure you would agree, there is a spate of players that intentionally waste other people’s time for their own amusement.”
Objection: Speculation
“I’ve resorted to spamming the wow emote and roping them back as a message to them that being an a**hole can work both ways, and that I’m just here to play a game, which sometimes has the desired effect.”
Objection: Prejudicial, inflammatory
“To get selfish players intentionally time wasting to make other’s concede out of impatience is not part of the deal.”
Objection: Speculation
“So if a player spends 99% of their turn just to press end turn, that should trigger some kind of response from the game to suggest their may be time wasting, and repeated instances, then, are punished, to preserve player’s enjoyment and to keep the game from being ruined by selfish players.”
Objection: Speculation
“It’s a function exploit at the expense of the opponent for no reason beyond self gratification.”
Objection: Speculation
If @Benzy actually was taking a roper to trial he himself should be the one who stands accused. He would be liable to pay the trial fees as he had no legal grounding. He would also be liable to pay damages if spam emoting were a punishable offence.
All this is not to say you can’t suggest changes to the turn system. What I’m trying to say is that any transgressions against ropers in-game, post-game and on the forum are ungrounded, and anyone who carry out such transgressions are the ones who are punishable from a legal standpoint.
In the anti-ropers defense, it seems like they are just trying to understand why anyone would rope at all. A simple reason which I believe everyone can understand is simply to enjoy the design, artwork and beauty of it all. There doesn’t need to be any reason besides this for roping to be justified. If Blizzard doesn’t want players to spend all of their turn time admiring the game, then changes can be made, but until then, treat all ropers as innocent until proven guilty. As mentioned by different posts earlier the game is meant to be fun, and arguably nothing is more fun than marvelling at this gorgeous game’s beauty without a care in the world.