against Warrior Rdruid - how fun is that?
4 Likes
Iâd say not enough rdruid-warriors from SP-rogue PoV.
1 Like
welcome to tbc
3 Likes
What are you playing?
prob mage/Rogue
1 Like
Mage/Rogue
War/Druid
Ret/Rsham
Hunter/Druid
Warlock/Druid
Mage/Priest
Warlock/Priest
Rogue/Priest
Rogue/Druid
Thatâs all you see in TBC 2vs2.
3vs3 is full of melee cleave, RMP, and WLD.
5vs5 is zug zug land.
1 Like
It is probably the most effective comp that requires the least amount of skill to play.
rmp and double healer lock wants to have a talk with you
Except RMP is not easy or low skill. A bit silly even to compare RMP to Warrior Druid, but I guess you start taking swings at people without thinking.
You got me, I was just trolling. RMP is a highly skilled comp only the best of the best can play, im just a jealous non rogue/mage/priest player.
1 Like
Kinda is though
Itâs extremely scripted and gets a lot of free wins from just being able to do stupid amounts of pressure
Do not dishonor the Great Troll Tribes of the North ever again by associating yourself to them. You are their pet at best.
Good luck.
there are so few of that running allround, you wont see that very often. There are only a few pvp hunters compared to anything else. Also you forgot ret + rshaman
it kills mostly even without cc on healer if the healer is not the killtarget 
1 blanked counterspell and the target can die.
But tbf, most combs have high consistant preassure. for myself, i play thug as sv hunter in tbc, and we also have really high preassure on targets, without me beeing BM hunter.
the only thing i regret is not beeing dwarf and our preist beeing human xD
i donât think anyone in the right mind would play TBC and expect to see variety of comps in arena. As a rogue, primarily playing with Sp and mage in 2s, iâd say that i wish there were more rdruid + warr teams in 2s, but i can definitely see how that comp can be a cancer for non rogue teams, when a warrior keeps you stunned for longer than a rogue you know the coding is absolute garbozono, but oh well
Mmmh there is a comp with rogue that is hard countered by Rdruid/war, itâs Rdruid/rogue.
I do not think you know what that means if thatâs how youâre going to use it
1 Like
That sir, is debatable
Let me edit it right here, if youâre talking about rogues that only use 2 weapons with 100% textbook wound on MH and crippling on OH - yea, those rogues usually get devastated not just by warr druids but other comps too, but itâs not 2006 anymore.
That is wrong.
I play resto druid rogue at 1800 rating, use 3 OH weapons with different poisons. Resto druid war is our counter, that is for sure. I donât know if you played that comp this season but you should try it. You would see that 1700+ resto druid war are running on you. Or at least, I can admit that I probably donât play well, but resto druid war is easier to master at least, making it actually hard to beat if you donât have a good experience in resto druid rogue.
Well, I do agree that warr/druid is easier, simply because warriors do not have alot of tools and itâs really easy to âmasterâ a warrior, especially if you have a mace and youâll probably reach 80-85% of your potential maximum rating even if youâre backpeddling and keyboard turning, but reality is that there are many ways to win vs war/dru as rogue/dru, rogue can have inifinitely more pressure on druid, than warrior can, your druid should always win on mana simply because he doesnât have to use abolish poison, warrior can be ccâd alot more often than rogue can, if enemy warrior is on you all the time and your druid is unable to heal you, itâs your druidâs fault, warrior should not be on you most of the time, if you still canât do anything about it you can even kill warrior as long as your druid ccâs enemy druid enough, Iâm not denying the fact that TBC is insanely RNG based and you can get absolutely destroyed by a 1600 Andy zug, but on the paper you should win