Account Bound Stable

I recently decided to make a Nightborne hunter since I had a SL boost sitting there and I really wanted to try a max leveled Marksmanship hunter (most of my experience comes from Survival and Beastmaster). Once I used the boost and teleported to the small intro, I noticed the pet I was given was a generic wolf. I wouldn’t normally mind, but the Nightborne starter pet is the only Manasaber that is not considered exotic and I really wanted it for my huntress. Unfortunately, support can do nothing about it so I was left to wonder if there was a way I could get the pet otherwise (I know going BM is an option but I already have two BM hunters around).

Now to the point. The only way for me to be able to get the pet without having to recreate the character and losing all the rare pets I have managed to get would be an account bound stable. To be honest I think such a feature will be helpful for people that have many characters and want specific pets for all of them. How much easier will it be for a newly created hunter to get a rare pet like Loque’nahak if this Stable existed and the player had already tamed it with another hunter? Also, in my case it would mean I’d just have to create a new Nightborne hunter and delete it after unlocking the pet, making it instantly available for the other hunters.

I don’t know how difficult it may be to add such a thing in game but, from my understanding of how the game’s UI works, adding a database in the Collection tabs like you have the mounts and wardrobe named Stable can’t be that hard. And the options with it are unlimited. You can have the tamable pets you don’t have all greyed out and a small window with information on where you can get them. In case of similar models, they can also appear in the same way they do in Wardrobe.

I’d really like more hunters’ input on this. My personal opinion is that this will be a real quality of life change and it will make camping rares to tame easier by minimizing the antagonism. Less hunters camping a rare means more happy hunters and even mount hunters considering some new tamable creatures drop mounts.

3 Likes

Hunter is a way of life. If you don’t want to put in the effort to tame those rare beasties then you shouldn’t have them. Account-bound stable would just be another step in the wrong direction for the class IMO. I for one like going out into the wilds to track those beasties. I have 3 Hunters and it never bothered me to have to find those rare pets.

3 Likes

I would agree with that IF the major RP hunters had in classic was still in the game. Remember pet food? Good times.
But as it stands having your own identity does come from mogs and pet combinations these days. So to me the OP is not wrong to ask for an account wide pet stable. Especially when talking about pets that are literally unobtainable with other methods.
Lastly try and tell me taming Oondansta was fun for you please. Because to my memory it was a torture of stolen tags that i would never want to go through again.

2 Likes

Noted. I will make sure to delete my characters once I get my account bound stable to save all my rare pets. Especially those I have twice.

1 Like

Account bound stable would ruin the entire point and feel so no.

2 Likes

Oondasta is exactly what I was thinking about as I was making this post. Imagine rerolling a hunter and wanting to tame her in a high population server and there are a bunch of people that want the mount. Or the new Ivory Cloud Serpent that is a nightmare to spawn and there are a thousand desperate people camping it for the mount. Good luck on a single tame…

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.