All anti-RDF arguments are outdated

[Triva-theradras]

@Nikkyblond-firemaw

How about ulduar and ICC should they be in from the get go also?

@Triva-theradras

13. RDF was part of wotlk about 42% of its duration. Its not that no content was released after RDF was out. 2 months after RDF was introduced, ICC was fully opened and another 5 months later Ruby Sanctum was released.
    Furthermore, its not content, but a qol feature, comparable to guild banks, which were implemented earlier, too. Raids are actual content, so they can only be released at a specific point in the progression timeline. Features can potentially added/removed any time without influence on the content progression.
    RDF was not a feature that was deemed harmful, but helpful. They removed the fire from Ring of Valor and later even removed the whole arena to rework it, because the design was flawed. Not adding the fire, an aspect REMOVED for good reasons, makes sense. However RDF was ADDED and stayed in the game until today, because it did more good than harm. Removing a feature because it was added later, was never even considered for any other feature either.

As said dozens of times before, a qol feature is different from actual gear progression content. Seems only you cannot understand this.