wut?
Pretty sure I got more Alliance than Horde characters… And I play both factions
Yes they do but writing a weird dramatic paragraph about how someone with a different opinion on a 15 year old game makes them basically subhuman is kinda like… weeeird.
I’m ready to link Merriam-Webster’s definition of troll if it comes to that. Otherwise, they can try to prove me wrong.
And for the record, I can get flagged for having a brain working far far FAR better than one in the skull of That Which Should Be Ignored. 5 flags = post gets hidden until a mod takes interest, then it’s up to them. Now take into account that there are lots of trolls in here…
When you see that one troll keeps writing bollocks how the problem (covenants = player power):
doesn’t exist
doesn’t matter to them
isn’t so bad anyway
prove it’s bad
you’re faking numbers, you can’t prove it’s bad
no, YOU bad
that’s it, troll leaves! you so bad!
3s later troll is back and asks: …but how you can think covenants bad?! prove it!
I dare say it’s normal reaction to a troll: Suffer not the troll to live. The Internet kind, ofc. I can get that a solo player doesn’t care so much about Covenants potentially getting them not invited into X activity because Y cov ability sucks there, but, y’know, it’s not a solo RPG but MMO. With millions of players. Not one. So the problem exists and people saying it doesn’t are kinda like those flat earth loons. The solution is 1) education 2) outliving them 3) ridiculing them while educating them. No points for guessing which option I favor.
Pretty sure I’ve seen your posts kept in kinda RPing tone of “kill all humans, humans bad, living humans very bad, only good humans dead humans”. Is it getting out of hand? Are there TWO of you now?
I still have no idea who this troll you’re so upset at is. I mean you literally just said that they should die. Now I’ve admittedly said that certain people should have their life privilege revoked before, but that wasn’t over an opinion on videogames.
The thing is expressing positivity to covenants would be the same as expressing positivity towards azerite armor a couple of years ago. I do get why “choice is good” but the negative aspects outweight the positives one (if there are positive points of course).
It’s so easy to break point by point that system in order to understand that’s really really bad.
Just because they’re separate doesn’t mean they’re not both bad.
I doubt anyone would say they aren’t different. But it is a very fine example that no matter how bad something is, there will always be “people” to back it up.
My point was and will forever be, that just because you “can like something” does not mean that you should. You can go down on this anthill and defend it with all your glory and might, however this won’t change the fact that some things are bad without redemption and only ignorant fools/people that lack empathy protect them.
Appreciate the link though. Did not do any in depth research about them covenants. And I just want to know what is good and what is bad.
The TL:DR version for me.
T something, character is female human hunter, doubleplus unsmart, seems immature, fails logic hard. Seen A LOT of “ignored content” quote frames in this thread, so considering it’s almost the same topic as the one in which I’ve called its BS, chances are it’s the same troll.
It’s reference to Warhammer 40000. PG-13 version could look like: Suffer not the troll to write on forums.
See this is what I mean. Not that I disagree looking at majority of human characters in WoW…
And this is the gist of the problem with The Nameless Troll. Been there, done that, it still kept arguing “you bad”. You can’t have a normal discussion with people behaving like that.
Welcome to the flag risk zone. We have mana cookies! And while you’re here, can you explain wtf you meant by
as I’m quite sure the only parts that COULD reasonably be considered abusive were pointed at the unworthy trolling human hunter?
In France, we have a meme : The good and the bad hunter. When the bad hunter sees something moving, he then shoot it. However, when the good hunter sees something moving, he then shoot it, but he’s good hunter.
So in this case, I would say, there is the good and the bad layer of system. The bad one has a lot of stupid and unfun grind, that would lock your build and forbid ways of experimenting. Whereas the good one has a lot of stupid and unfun grind, that would lock your build and forbid ways of experimenting, but it’s a good one!
If it’s subjective, then saying covenants are fine and good is as subjective as saying they are bad.
I’ll never back up on mein ideas. Never! As long as these dudes are keep displaying their nonsense, I’ll be voicing mein opinions!
Tahra isn’t a troll.
I know trolls, and I’ve seen her around a lot, she’s not a troll, she just has different opinions to you.
yes yes yes I know it’s the literal one joke Warhammer fans have, “kill le xenos haha”.
Alright but that logic is totally different and a totally incorrect comparison.
Liking concentration camps is a moral objective bad thing to think. Liking covenants is not objective, nor is it morally bad.
For example if I said. “Wow, you hate covenants? Well I mean some people still hate minorities, so not surprising”, that’s clearly insane correct? And a total false equivalency between a moral wrong and a videogame.
Just because you can like something does not mean that you should, and no matter how much you move the goalpost, this won’t change. The only reason why I gave this example, is due to the fact that a lot of players (including you in this topic), have the empathy of a rock and need the most hyperbole idea to even begin understanding why they are at odds.
Well it is not consecration camp - Good job detective.
This is literally talking about a dumb choice that will barely effect your classes dps/healing/tanking aren’t you taking this a liiiiittle too seriously?