I am not an expert like you here, and google is not really helpful for me to understand if I want something or if I should enable or disable something, thatās why I am asking your opinion.
hmmm so ā¦ do we use the recommended? cause the wow knows what it wants? xD
heeeeeeey 7 is bad.! lol i9??? wtf I dont think that wow is such a gameā¦ ā¦ its not like the red dead redemption for example xD which needs a Nasa Pc to be played with everything on max xD
Youāll be surprised good an experience 7 will get youā¦
The game engine that WoW uses is still largely CPU dependant, so the better your CPU is, the better game settings you can use - all the GPU does is be able to display the frames that the CPU renders, at the resolution of your choice. Most newer games will dump off (most, if not all of) the graphics processing to the GPU.
A better graphics card will enable you to play at 1440p or higher resolutions more smoothly.
And yes; any setting higher than 7 is provided for āballināā hardware of the i9/2080ti variety.
Hmmm ok, I set everything to 7. Although, I wanted my Environments to 10 I donāt think I might have a problemā¦ what do u think?
Also, I donāt think that the Graphics Quality Bar (7), adjusts the Advanced section tooā¦ can u help me on what should I have to pick there? Right now its :
These setting levels are getting into the ātoo advanced for meā territory, unfortunatelyā¦ might be worth comparing what GeForce Experience reckons you should use, compared to what āRecommendedā says & work from thereā¦ also depends on what content youāre looking to optimise your settings for.
Yeah, Geforce experience will use what settings your card can support. It wants to do the whole 4K and downsample to 1440p for me with the 2080ti. So I let it do that and does help with the image sort of.
For 10 though, top range intel i9 processor with 2080ti or a RTX Titan. Or a Ryzen 9 3950x will do it. (AMDās is only a few frames below Intel so itās not even worth mentioning. Around 1-2% lower FPS really)
But not even those will cope much if it gets too busy or thereās too much going on in large raids. Thatās why the game brought in a new secondary graphic setting to set it lower if you want when in such large/crowded areas.)
FPS/response time is more important than eye-candy graphics anyways when busy doing hard contentā¦
Iād say that could play a solid 7 with maxed view distance and animations on 1080p
Or higher without those two
Iād keep shadow quality on low tho, the only way I managed to prevent an FPS drop from maxed out shadow quality myself is memory sticks at 4k+ MHz
Shadow detail is added ābeautificationā that adds to the GPU load; if youāre on the edge of what your GPU can handle, itās one of those āless noticeable featuresā you can afford to lose.
Possibly they solved it when they expanded CPU functionality for the game but there used to be a time (for me) where Shadow quality: Low and shadow quality: Best was the difference between 120+ FPS and 20- FPS
Faster RAM memory solved that for me
Thatās about as cut and dry as I can make it
Thereās not a real noticeable difference either tbh thatās the worst part
It is definately not the RAM.
There must have been something wrong with your grfx driver or whatever.
Shadows donāt crush your FPS like that, unless your system is a toaster.
From highest to 2nd highest not that muchā¦ but from low to medium and highā¦ there is a big difference.
Sorry I was on vacations and I couldnt see you replies Thank you all very much! I bought AOC (AG241QX) 23.8", 2560x1440, 1ms, 1000:1, 144Hz, Gaming Monitor and I am going to do some testings