Dear Blizzard, quick guide on how to fix MM+

People invite meta specs because someone else said that it’s a meta spec. I don’t think you have to look for much more reasoning behind it. Ask any meta seeker why Resto Shaman isn’t meta anymore, and you most likely get very disappointing answers (or what’s required to fill the weaknesses of Disc).

And what’s meta for the 0.1% group isn’t inherently the best choice for the weekly +10 run. As long as we blindly follow the “meta” for content that’s not relevant for us, a solution is impossible to find.

I remember in one of the first weeks of this season someone complaining about me playing Disc Priest, because “Sorry bro, non meta healer. Not gonna make it”, while they just failed to interrupt :man_shrugging: They seek meta specs when they just horrendously fail in dealing with the mechanics. Can a meta spec boost them? Well, not a meta spec played by an average Joe. They do not do what they do up in the ranks - they don’t do what makes the spec meta. Simply put.

I am afraid we will have to agree to disagree.

Welp. It is what it is.

It is not relevant. What is possible at the highest levels of gameplay, will never really affect 99.9% of the player base.

Let me make something plainly simple for you: I don’t have a damage meter addon.

I don’t know how much damage do shamans or frost mages do, but as a tank, I have noticed two things:

  • The key (+6 and above) is far more likely to be timed if we have a DPS Shaman and a Frost Mage
  • It is much less likely that somebody will die if we have Resto Shaman or Priest healer

If I, a filthy casual who is sticking to 10-11, can observe this, then you can bet your butt that it’s significant.

1 Like

It is very relevant because people think you need for anything but a +6 a shaman or frost mage, aparently. Like you.
I so hard disagree it is unreal. I am blasting 10’s with any spec. And my mistweaver seems to blast too.

What you talk about is not relevant at all. You put 0.1% rules on +6 keys. Now talking about what is relevant or not…

Nellja is spot on. I know many others share the experience.
It’s easy to blast keys now that you’re fully geared and many nerfs have been applied to dungeons, but I bet you weren’t crushing +10s two months ago. In fact, I know you weren’t—I checked your logs. At the end of the day, the stats speak for themselves—people just need to take a closer look. Starting with Raiderio, it’s hard not to see the problem.

What is this even about?

You arent making any argument here.
https://raider.io/mythic-plus-runs/season-tww-1/7177581-10-mists-of-tirna-scithe
I do not know this is my first 10 timed, but i wasnt interested in searching. Look at all those shaman dps’es. And is 10 weeks (11th october. have to remind you it is christmas now) more or less than 2 months? Are we fully geared? :thinking:

Dont make this personal.

Incorrect. People prefer the meta specs, simply because with identically skilled players, they perform better. And you cannot screen for skill, only for gear and experience(score).

I don’t give a fish about meta specs. I rarely run my keys, because I tank and heal. I got invites almost instantly.

It is very real, we have different opinions, and that is fine. I seem to get unlucky with groups that lack any of the “preferred” specs.

I also like my Mistweaver. Both the Fistweaver and Soothing Mist style.

I am talking about my experience and observation.

Previously, every run with a Frost DK would be guaranteed to be timed. Now it feels like it happens mostly with Frost Mages and Shamans.

People on the same score are the same. The spec does not matter.

My experience is completely different. Basically because i give every spec a chance and am more interested in experiences.

This is completely off. If you’re playing Shaman DPS, Augmentation Evoker, or Protection Paladin, your spec will absolutely carry you up to a certain key level. This is a reality for a significant number of players using these classes.

1 Like

But no one talk about the repetitive content we have with m+ .

Basically we had WoD - Legion-BFA-Shadowlands-Dragonflight and right now Tww…
That’s 6 expansion with 4 seasons of m+=24 Season of repeatable content .(21 right now)

Right now i would dislike doing even a simple dungeon even if the prize was 100k or a million . I don’t know , is just feel tiresome since doesn’t actually offer any enjoyment anymore .

Next season again 4 old dungeon and the 4 current dungeon …amazing feeling redoing content for the 200 times … Nothing new nothing amazing …

The actual numbers right now have fall to 500k completed keys and many of them are for the same people that run for 8/8 and so on .

People got tired of redoing the same thing over and over and blizzard keep up putting the same old dungeon that we already have done for xx times .

It’s a diablo copy that every season we have a higher ilvl …and that’s all …

You are just as wrong as 11 october isn’t more than 2 months ago. Like you claimed in your previous post.

What is carrying is invites in groups by fools not understanding meta isn’t carrying. AugEvoker is doing even nothing for your random pug +7 key.

Agreed, constantly reusing four older dungeons feels like Blizzard is taking the easy route. We definitely deserve more original content in Mythic+ to keep things fresh and engaging.

I’m not trying to make this personal, but you only timed COT and GB 10 around 7–8 weeks ago. If that counts as “blasting 10s,” then we’re clearly not playing the same game. If you think mythic+ is fine as it is, that’s your opinion, and that’s totally valid—just say that and let’s move on. :slight_smile:

You literally try to make this personal to call me out. And you have checked logs. I am blasting 10’s since at least 10-11 weeks. And not fully geared.

1 Like

I’m just backing up my arguments with facts, nothing more. I won’t be engaging with you any further, and that’s perfectly fine. Cheers, mate.

I backed up my fact with that timed +10 with a group below 620 ilvl on 11th october. I am not interested in all dungeons. You go for my last timed +10. So whatever. If your statement is i am not blasting 10’s it does not matter which dungeons it are. I was blasting 10’s already.

https://raider.io/characters/eu/argent-dawn/Mistjo
Here. This is how much i am interested in city of threads :joy:

Cheers mate for not making this personal. You did a real good job with trying to call me out. Dont engage with me anymore, indeed. You know you were wrong.

Hard disagree unless you are talking about player perspective.
People think you need meta for 10s when you do not need it at all.
This was even the case on Prot paladin before the buffs to them.

Fun fact a couple of the meta or close to meta specs are worse then other specs in pugs and at key levels around 10 or lower.
And also no you are kinda very wrong as there is a different requirement in higher keys then in lower keys it is a different requirement in a skilled group in voice then a pug group.

1 Like

Do you have evidence to this claim? Number of timed runs %?

So am I kind of wrong or very wrong? :dracthyr_uwu:

But your statement is absolutely correct.

The thing is, at that level its pretty rare to see an enhance, ele, fdk or Boomie actually be really good and top the meters.
Most of the time they arent carrying anything, barely even themselves, yet the offmeta/bad specs do the damage because they didnt fotm reroll(which lets be honest, is the case for a very sizeable chunk of these meta spec players).

1 Like

It is more like; when you have a considered OP spec on the same score and ilvl and experience as a considered underperforming spec, then the player on the considered underperforming spec is on average a better player. Otherwise that ‘OP spec’ player should be higher.

And that is why nobody should look at specs for way below top keys. You want to build a comp so you have a battleres and maybe bloodlust, but other than that, nothing matters.

1 Like

Meta is in reality not meta. Because whatever is “meta” is whatever that player is best at.