Just what the title says, Hunter feels to me like it would be the perfect class if they were able to Dual wield in SV spec.
Looks and feel way cooler imo
Just wanted to say it really 
1 Like
It isn’t far fetched to be honest, and could feel pretty good yeah. I agree.
Well really why not have the option just as warriors/dks got?
Would feel alot like Rexxar in that case 
Blizz, plz add it in next major patch
2 Likes
Sv used to dualwield back in the days
Please blizzard DO NOT DO THIS!
We already have problems with loot for fury and frost especially because people asked for this kind of stuff for “flavor” reasons, and what happened is that it screws up the loot.
I repeat, DO NOT.
Like what is even the benefit? The rotation does not change, nothing changes, aside that now the game is objectively worse, it doesn’t bring any benefits, only deficits.
Please don’t screw up a third spec because of some nebulous flavor.
1 Like
oh yeah sure. because it must be realy hard to make 1h Weapons with AGI/STR on them like they did with Armor
stop making it a Problem because its none
1 Like
That’s not the issue dude.
You clearly do not understand what’s happening so ill make it stupid proof.
Frost dk used to be purely a dual wield spec, since legion and before shadowlands, which means you could have only gotten one handed weapons.
For dk you have unholy which wants two handed weapons, and frost which wants one handed weapons, they added two handed weapons for frost because people who have no idea what they are talking about wanted two handed for “flavor”, since unholy also needs 2 handed weapons you cannot set loot to unholy for frost because that will guarantee you will get the worst weapon type for frost.
So basically for frost there is no way to avoid getting 2 h weapons even if you really do not want them, and you indeed DO NOT WANT two handed for frost.
While for fury at least you can set arms loot, and completely remove one handed weapons from the loot table.
If they were to add one handed to survival, you cannot set loot to either mm or bm because duh, and obviously one option would be better than the other, so in the end the loot would be split between one and two handed even if you really want only one of the two.
So yea mr: stop making it a problem because there is none, YOU don’t know wtf you are talking about.
I guess they coukd just let people mog 2h to look like one hands. Maybe it would mess up some on the animations though.
Aactually in wotlk frost could either use 2h or 1h, so your argument is invalid.
Someone here needs to brush up on their reading skills.
Also it’s not invalid regardless of that, and you have no idea wtf you are talking about.
Geez, imagine a thread like this could stir stuff up abit, and yes i agree. DKs in wrath could use 1h or 2h.
And rly surv hunter would fit so much more imo with dual wield, just look at Rexxar for example (yes i know he’s suposse to be beastmaster) but you get my point :).
I’d prefer dual-wielding to twohanders for aesthetic reasons. I believe both Mok’nathal and Dark Rangers dual-wield.
I wish survival could use a gun, but instead of being a 40 yard range normal gun it would be a 20 yard range shotgun with short range heavy hitting aoe abilities.
Always loved how in GW2 you have different guns for different specs, like deadeye has a sniper rifle with 1500 range, warrior has a regular rifle with 1200 range and engineer has a shotgun that does the maximum amount of damage at around 300-600 range.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.