How would players react to the Alliance losing?

Lore Story
142

Sereluna:

I like the suggestions I see, unfortunately we have a lot of people trying to derail the thread. Stop doing so, you will be reported. But, I am happy everyone here agrees on Blizzard’s blatant Horde favoritism.

! Sereluna:

…No. I am starting a discussion and people come in here accusing me of trolling and trying to derail the thread, so I report them for such behaviour.

! Sereluna:

Chill the hell out dude. I am not Reporting people to the police, I am reporting them to the forum moderators.

! Sereluna:

Lies. Reporting you for trolling.

![ Sereluna:

More lying and trolling. Hope there is some permaban function on this forum. This repeated trolling of yours cannot be allowed.
[/quote]

Check the above. All your words. All yours. Same thread. It didn’t take much in the way of intellectual capacity, to be honest, just copying and pasting your own words…

Full quote please. Full quote. “I can’t, because to stop Lying would mean that I had started”

When I use a word, I use it to mean what the word actually means. I said Empirical and I meant Empirical, I provided Empirical evidence. You do not know me, you do not know what I understand, or do not. If you were to question me on the “Off Side Rule” I would be wholly unable to explain it to you, however assuming I do not know what a word means despite having used it for just under thirty years in its correct context is simply ignorant. I said Empirical, and I meant Empirical, It is that simple. Do not flatter yourself that I looked up words especially to debate with you. I did not.

I can tell you have never worked in the customer service industry over the telephone or internet, or you would have a fully grounded understanding of that principle. A Vastly small percentage of the message is the words spoken or typed, the vaster part is the tone, pitch, facial expression and context. The actual words spoken or typed count as less than 30% of the message.

On the contrary, We both are, I am so broadminded you could almost pull my brains out of my ears and tie them around the back of my head. That’s a Metaphor by the way, or possibly Hyperbole, to actually attempt that would be murder.

Just given the proof from your own words or typed words up above…

I do believe I said ‘Empirical’. You can’t call me out for using the word, and then misunderstand it…

I mean you know what Empirical means? But regardless, I have provided proof above of your threats to report people. Or do you deny those were your words all from the same thread?

3 Likes
143

Poor Brigante, why do you waste time arguing with pigeon?
While your patience is inspiring I don’t think this effort will ever pay off. This person is too headstrong to actually have proper debate with.

2 Likes
144

This is now the official Way Anduin survives the Blight at SoL.
Like if you agree.

2 Likes
145

And everything else, basically.

1 Like
146

And yet in note one of those quotes do I threaten people for expressing dissent, which is what you claimed I did. Sure, I threatened to report people, but never for expressing dissent. I does not matter if I threatened to report people, unless you can find a citation of me saying I did it because they were expressing a different opinion, you are still a liar. If that was the evidence you had, you have confirmed you were lying. Now, present a single citation where I threatened people, with the reason for it being that they were expressing a dissenting opinion, which is what you claimed I did:

Because with your constant posts saying you are going to report people who show a different opinion or try to debate the matter

and not simply that I was threatening to report people. LIke, I hope you realize the difference. Unless you think trolling and derailment are just different opinions, you mus admit you have not provided a shred of evidence for your claim.

Yes, ans still it was too much for you.
In the first one I threatened to report people for derailing the thread, not for voicing dissenting opinions. Same with the second. The fouth one was for a person lying about my activities and so was the fifth.

You provided no evidence. You claimed I never remained civil or unbiased, and provided no documentation of all my behaviour that showed this had never occured. With empirical evidence, you have to show something that can be sensed by the humans you are providing it to, that is the crux of empiricism. And if you did indeed provide empirical evidence, provide it a second time, it should be easy, right?

Here is the full quote:

No evidence that anyone can observe to back it up.

Also, unlike you, I can see where you got confused here. Would you like me to point it out so you do not fall into such a trap?

I understand you do not know what empiricism is.

Sure, but you used anecdotal evidence. You saying “x is y” does not make x=y. The fact that you thought your anecdotal evidence, being your personal experience reading my posts, is empirical shows your ignorance.

You mean you have not already?

You clearly do not understand what empirical means. If you are going to make a claim about everything I have done on this forum, being I have never been honest or unbiased, you are claiming to have had an experience of all my forum activities. If you have not, then you have not used empiricism, and thus are lying.

Sure, but never threats justified by the reason you proclaimed, being offering different opinions.

Excuse me… He is the one claiming I threatened to report people for expressing different opinions, and never providing evidence for that, and fails to understand that empirical evidence that I have never remained civil or unbiased would require him to have studied all my forum activity. How am I in the wrong? Please explain that to me? If one of you can just make one argument to illustrate that I am too headstrong, and not jsut you being bad at providing evidence, I will admit fault. Like, I can make the exact same argument without proof. We are not going to get anywhere if you guys just keep saying debate is impossible, without giving me constructive criticism showing why.

1 Like
147

Hasn’t this debate with Serulena reporting crap out of everyone started like a month ago?

148

To be fair, I never actually managed to report anyone, having only tried it on one poster.

149

Shrug I think anyone is entitled to speak their mind on any matter. Unless you pay for someone elses sub. Still think this is the wrong place to do it though.

1 Like
150

Let me see if I got this right:
Void energy is one of the most dangerous thing’s around, everyone who’s ever been in contact with it has become corrupted. It’s something so dangerous that Lich King and Burning Legion wanted to destroy Azeroth to avoid that energy to spread through the world.
A group of BE researchers start messing with it, are exiled from Silvermoon and become corrupted by the Void, until Alleria (under the Void influence) saves them…and Anduin simply accepts them, without any reservation from anyone else because “he’s so understand,open and progressive”?
I’m already imagining him accepting Yrel, the Light fanatical, into his ranks as well…and then Sylvana’s the mad one…

1 Like
151

Look all of you are Wrong.
Greyman is right now it ends this Silly “Discussion”
Thank you very much.

This is about a Horde Victory.
Not a Sylvanas victory.
Not Who is the most pretty Maiden, for I already won that competition!

Not whenever Sereluna is Biased or that Brigg is Wrong.

IT IS about how would you react to a Horde Victory in this Over All conflict upon Azeroth!

Returns to nom deep pan pizza

2 Likes
152

There is no need to worry about bad writing, bad writing got us in the current lore spot.

153

Uhhhm dude…
You don’t know Anduin then.
He sees the good in everyone. He would try to reason with Yrel to the very end and before trying to kill Sylvanas, he’d do everything to get her on the right path.

The Void Elves haven’t been corrupted yet. That is more than enough reason for Anduin to give them a chance.

154

After the Night Elves, on their home turf, losing to a handful of Orcs in WC3 and then again, with the rest of the Alliance, losing to the Horde all the time in WoW I’d be miffed if they’d lose again.
If this story had any logic to it there wouldn’t even be a Horde to begin with.

155

I would be disappointed but not surprised in the slightest.

The Alliance has proven itself woefully inept at anything slightly related to the military, or strategy, or tactics. In fact I am surprised the Alliance leaders can even put on their own clothes in the morning.

And then on the other hand, you have the Horde pulling soldiers and vast armies out of the blue. How a scavenged fleet of ragged orcish survivors became the superpower of Kalimdor in just a couple of decades and seemingly had the most bodies of all the Horde faction despite nonstop wars is beyond me.

These are the type of beginner writing worldbuilding mistakes we call young, inexperienced fanfic writers out on, not multimillion dollar companies able to afford the crëme dela crëme of authors & lore savants.

1 Like
156

You didn’t understand me. My point wasn’t that he isn’t understanding, because that’s his strength, he’s similar to Thrall that he will always try to find peaceful way to sort things.
My point was that no one around him questioned his acceptance of a group of Void Influenced Blood Elves…they’re just given free access to everything because Alleria, another character under the Void influence, tells Anduin it’s safe. Yet if it was Sylvana doing that, everyone would be going crazy, she only accepts evil factions…
And there is no talk with Yrel anymore, the entire point of that storyline is that full Light worship is as bad as everything else, which had already been made in Legion by Illidian.

Almost every single character that has come under contact with the Void has been eventually corrupted…especially ones that willingly accepted the Void into them, like these did. Just because Alleria, who is also under the Void influence, tells them it’s ok, means little…It’s like a Goblin telling you that your money is safe in the hands of another Goblin…if you believe that without any reservations…

1 Like
157

Guys, guys! Is it just me or is the hate between Void and Blood Elf really going strong in here?! D:

2 Likes
158

It is only natural when talking with them crack headed thug traitors.

1 Like
159

Well the high born elves -did- backstab us how many times now? I guess they don’t like their hypocrisy being called out, by their own kind no less! Good people on both sides, indeed.

While it is the stance of many Kaldorei to agree with this, you’re on your last notice high born elf. The Alliance will not accept another backstab…I hope.

1 Like
160

Woah, personal much… They’re like the dumb cousins of us, proper and real Highborne! D:

1 Like
161

The highborne are simply a relic of the past compared to us Sin’dorei the true masters of the arcane you should have stayed at your ruined city oldman

2 Likes