"if you already know stormkeeper instead gain 1 more charge of stormkeeper" is this a mistake?

is this bad wording? Because there is no 2nd node for another stormkeeper or am i missing something? Im guessing its left over from previous version but its pretty bad because some people might like a 2nd charge but its misleading on a important spell.

1 Like

just means if you use stormkeeper and the passive stormkeeper charge rotates round you dont lose the extra charge and instead you have 3 charges

This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.