I cannot agree or disagree with a position that lacks elementary logic. You call the very basis of the subject “unimportant”. That’s akin to to judging a person for violent behavior without caring to find out what exactly that person did and if other people in society get punished for the same behavior.
Erevien’s logic is simplistic, but at least is clear and makes sense:
“I am a devoted horde player, I hate the Alliance and I will cherry pick whatever arguements needed to reinfoice my hatred torwards them”.
I disagree with his position, but I can understand it.
What you’ve been saying so far, though, seems like a double talk and therefore is beyond comprehension.