He wants to plat the game and advertise at the same time

Punyelf

He wants to plat the game and advertise at the same time
Perhaps someone saw a low level toon standing around doing nothing and assumed they were a bot, advertiser or up to no good.
Perhaps they should stand in a cellar or bedroom of an Inn or somewhere else out of the way.
Or be stealthed.
If they arenât actually posting in the Trade channel then the only way someone would know youâre there is to see a toon standing there and if itâs out in the open like beside the bank it going to get noticed.
You using a trial account to advertise.
Maybe just purchase second account and you can still achieve the same thing and make sure you boost that character to 70, as I suspect, you are being reported.
Another workaround is a get a friend or guild member/community member to advertise on your behalf, assuming they have no issue being idle.
Goldshire inn maybe
Probably not the best if you want to be out of sight.
Maybe the Inn in Mage Quarter (Slaughtered Lamb if I recall it correctly) or the one in Dwarven District (The Worried Ram if I can just make up a name to hide my lack of knowing the actual one).
We can see the murlocs over their heads. Itâs what all the trade sellers do.
the murlocs over their heads
Never noticed this.
Is it to indicate a Trial account?
Slaughtered Lamb
Yes the lock trainers are there in classic cool little place
I am a guide, I help new players, they see a mark over my head in the open world and I see a murloc over theirs.
So these hiding murlocs are usually sellers.
Hello,
Iâm Game Master Hahrenzaon and I picked up your ticket regarding your other Battle.net account being permanently closed. Rest assured that Iâll look into this.
From what I can see, the account was found violating our Terms of Use and End User License Agreement. I also checked and found no signs of exploitative activity on your account. As such, this action is now upheld and will not be reversed or changed.
I understand that you may still have concerns regarding the action, but I must reiterate that it was taken to address a violation of the Terms of Use and End User License Agreement, which you can learn more about by visiting: https://www.blizzard.com/en-us/legal/ Keep in mind that this is something that all players accept before logging into the game.
While these policies may seem harsh, they are in place to ensure that every player is able to enjoy their time in our games. Thanks for respecting our position and decision.
Regards,
Game Master Hahrenzaon
Blizzard Entertainment
Letâs for a moment ignore everything about whether the OP is guilty or not and just look at this message in isolation.
This message is a load of waffle, and it should be illegal.
I understand that it is industry practice, but regardless. It should be. They should have to tell you which section of the contract (EULA) and TOS you breached instead of just âwe reserve the right to ban you at any time for any reason byeâ
Would it really have been so difficult to tell the OP why he got banned? Heâs completely confused, and fair enough when getting that kind of message.
At least knowing a category would help I agree.
maybe cause i didnt verifai my accaunt?
i made 3rd accaunt and when clicking link in email i did put my email and login and see msg accaunt verifai or similar
1st and 2nd only clicked link
Whatâs the condition for those Murloc icons? Is it just based on account age or something?
Iâm just wondering if my 2 level 20 bankers have one of those.
Itâs not your level, itâs the status of your account. So most of us making alts will never be a murloc unless we add a new wow account to our bnet. Or set up a separate one.
Itâs something that marks new players and returning veterans. Once a player reaches level 61 and has 40 hours played they are removed from the newcomer status.
The easiest way to see is if the game puts you in newcomer chat without being a guide.
This message is a load of waffle, and it should be illegal.
I understand that it is industry practice, but regardless. It should be. They should have to tell you which section of the contract (EULA) and TOS you breached instead of just âwe reserve the right to ban you at any time for any reason byeâ
The counter point to that is that then exploiters tweak it so it doesnât contravene section x so then the EULA has to be amended and simple GMs have to become proficient in legalese.
For wow /shrug. Their house their rules. For things like google I agree its much more impactful, youâre getting locked out of life itself in some ways if that happens.
The counter point to that is that then exploiters tweak it so it doesnât contravene section x so then the EULA has to be amended and simple GMs have to become proficient in legalese.
I really, really donât think this is a very good argument.
For one, the GM in this case would be behaving somewhat like the police, and if the police are unable to understand the âlawâ then thereâs a good chance neither does the player - which means the player didnât understand what they agreed to even if they had tried.
Thatâs not okay and, interestingly, already illegal in the EU, not that anybody seems to care. Same as those cookie warnings, the EU courts are hideously ineffective at dealing with small-scale rule breaking.
For another, if the rules do not cover the alleged activity, then it was not bannable, and the player should not be punished, even if it was disruptive. Tweak the rules and have the players agree to that one instead, notify of the change.
And finally, overall the law is doing pretty well at dealing with the very same sorts of things that can happen in WoW. In fact, the basic criminal laws in Denmark are remarkably short and WoW would probably only need 1/4th of those rules to cover anything you can possibly do. It should be rather doable.
I think, when people have sunk 15 years or more into an account, they deserve some law and order.
You can have 8 WoW accounts on 1 battle net so why did you open another one?
I also checked and found no signs of exploitative activity on your account. As such, this action is now upheld and will not be reversed or changed.
Sounds a bit like AI got confused
Sounds a bit like AI got confused
Yeah that was a bit weird, but I think what it means is that they didnât find that anyone had hacked him and broke the rules.
No idea
But now kinda dont want to
If trial accaunt got ban everything thats is linked to batle net is banned
No idea
But now kinda dont want to
If trial accaunt got ban everything thats is linked to batle net is banned
Bans are per license for WoW, not Bnet account
I have 2 active and 1 inactive wow account.(one is horde, one is alliance) and have some questions concerning merging multiple accounts to a single battle.net account.Q1: Out of the 2 active accounts 1 is banned from the forums permanently. If