Second least played class above 1800 rating in arenas and it gets a nerf while DH and Warrior get buffed?
How does this make any sense at all, it would make sense if it was a buff but a nerf? Is this a typo perhaps? DK has a huge lack of damage in arenas compared to other classes, so a nerf really doesn’t make any sense.
Some clarification on this would be nice because there’s no way this is intended?
That is not the Blizzard way. When they nerf things it’s mainly for PvE (always has been), except for some outliers where they nerf for PvP. That it because Blizzard really doesn’t care that much about PvP, I guess we all thought we knew by now?
Thats usually not how Blizzard works.
They will try to prevent negative effects, but only if it is possible within a hotfix. And in this case, nerfing uDKs apparently was deemed impossible to do without effects in PvP while warriors did get a buff to MS with a nerf in PvP to keep it the same in that.
Which is why I said there are some outliers. The reason for the DK nerf is that they are far ahead of everyone else in PvE (which is Blizzards main concern). That is why they were nerfed.
but, Arms warrior was considered Overpowered in a PvP enviroment yet intentionally has left it so.
blizzard shape a Meta that they want to happen and they use the buffs and Nerfs to ensure of such a thing the classes they dont want to be in that meta, they dont really look after.