Lone Wolf for Survival

Please ? I don’t want to bother with the stupid AI anymore.

5 Likes

Then you shouldn’t of picked a pet class?

Lets remove. All lock pets as well then, and your elementals their ai is just as stupid

And what about Marksmanship ?

What about It? lone wolf is there so you can be a sniper and it’s a half assed clunky spec

So MM can be a petless spec and not Survival ? ok.

4 Likes

kinda funny since 99% of warlocks in pvp play with grimoire of sacrifice

5 Likes

Which empowers them and is part of their mechanics we love our pets and are freinds we don’t sacrifice them to the void for power.

Sad actually our pets die too easily arleast warlocks get to use them for life force hahaha.

Saying that I still love the hunter just not MM don’t mind it in Pve though

No thank you.

2 Likes

Then don’t use it.

2 Likes

If its top dps most people will use it even if they dont want to.

I also dont know why so many people are struggeling with the pet ai. Killcommand even charges your pet to your target

3 Likes

If it’s like Marksman’s Lone Wolf, we’d all have to use it. It would only be acceptable if it didn’t give any damage bonus, so you’d take a small dps loss for being incapable of controlling your pet.

I’m with you I have no trouble. The second pet on animal companion likes to run back and forth in torgahst and I’m sure this. Is. A. Net dps. Loss so I’ve stopped using animal companion there otherwise I think pets are fine personally controlling them is part of the hunters charm for me

2 Likes

such a flawed thinking.

1 Like

It really isn’t. Marksmen get a measly TEN PERCENT damage bonus from Lone Wolf and it’s enough to make pets an unthinkable idea for them. I do mythic raiding and try to do high keys as well. I can’t show up in a group with my already undertuned and undevalued spec and go “well my dps will be 10% lower but look how pretty my raven is”.

You pick a pet spec, demand that IT conform to YOUR capabilities or lack thereof, and MY thinking is flawed for saying that it should only be possible if it’s not a dps gain? Get outta here.

Pet’s are bad, I don’t care about the 10% increase since it’s already a 20% loss with a pet.

1 Like

Then why play survival?

Only reason i see is to be a melee with a pet

Do I have to answer such a silly question ?

1 Like

Yes? all melees are better & more intresting than survival, except for the pet!

The pet is what makes survival delicous! :drooling_face:

Locks can voluntarily remove their pets through GoSac.

As a former SV hunter, I hated my pet. This is not a blanket statement. There are also hunters in lore who treat their pets as tools and don’t respect or love them at all.

Because it’s a cool spec with unique tools that have nothing to do with the pet. The pet is a mobile kill command and master’s call button.

100% subjective opinion.

Also 100% subjective opinion.

2 Likes

For some people it’s class fantasy of the ranger/sniper archetype of not pet, other’s just cba with the broken pet AI we’ve had since Legion when they broke it.
For pure ST fights having a pet out is better than no pet and vice versa on AoE where no pet is better.

People not inviting SV hunters are morons anyway, the spec just has one liability that is being melee, dmg wise it’s fine and it has some utility in being mobile but doesn’t bring any buff or debuff to the group hence why its down prioritized over other melee.

Anyway, I’d rather RSV comes back than a “lone wolf” option for SV, at least let me use my CD as SV w/o LoS.

1 Like