You forgot to mention Blood Elf female holy paladin / disc priest.
The horde not being the dead faction for pvp 10 years in a row?
Lemme just meld and avoid dying.
Lemme just meld drink and win the game.
Actually lemme just randomly restealth in the middle of kidney vendetta.
If you think racials don’t matter then you’re honestly delusional and i don’t even know what to say.
You’re comparing to NA region where people play offmeta comps, choose racials by the look and genuinely dont give a fúck.
I absolutely agree there shouldnt be this big cutoff difference but since every horde racial except orc is an absolute garbage you’re putting yourself in a disadvantage.
Why there isn’t a single Undead rogue on ladder, It’s the best looking race.
I guess abusing Nelfs is way more fun. You open up the ladder and you see 80% of top ladder being either Night elves or humans.
Like it’s your absolute own choice, go and play yourself with a Tauren rdruid or an undead disc and lets see where will it take you. If it’s the free R1 path why wouldn’t you take it.
You either buff horde racials or you just delete them from the game so there’s even less buttons to press.
2 Likes
So you think that because SOME comps/specs are better on alliance, all horde players should get a faceroll mid tier gladiator rank 1 title?
We get it bro, ur a 1x bfa horde r1 and you wanna feel good about it
1 Like
meld already got nerfed, plus it was only really broken because of maledict tbh
if they nerf alliance racials they also have to nerf orc because everyone either plays orc or blood elf (pala). Orc is pretty much on par with human.
I actually think undead is one of the ugliest races in the game after model rework.
Already did it last season and it was pretty damn easy compared to the effort I had to put in on alliance, plus I had like 408 ilvl compared to 420 on alliance.
The main point is that alliance only has less spots because the faction is dead and has less players. If they are not going to merge the cutoff again, then they should give both factions the same amount of titles. There’s like no reason not to do that.
I actually wanted to openly discuss but i forgot there’s still forum autists sitting here 24/7 ready to attack.
I’ve got my rating in BfA just as you did Drae so we both know it’s an absolute worthless number and an irrelevant title that noone gives a fúck about.
But for some reason you still think you’re special.
I just wonder if there’s gonna be a single Horde player on ladder after cuttoffs merge. 
1 Like
You are the only one attacking people here, just sayin’. I’m not only talking about this one specific thread. I remember a time when every single one of your comments had my name in it
Well, the argument that rating in X expansion doesn’t matter is stupid to begin with. Legion was mostly just as braindead as BfA
Never thought I’m special, I’m not the one trashtalking others about it, you are.
Allrighty i’ll stop attacking people then. 
Racials do matter to some extent but i doubt their plan worked. Generally i think if youre good enough to be r1, you get it regardless.
Id love orc relentless to just f off too.
top 0.1% over all factions r1 top 0.5% over all fations glad, all other rewards evenly split out below. was perfect like b4.
Lmao get lost. These titles shouldnt be given everyone.
They won’t be. A rating or a percentage requirement is almost interchangable anyway, since the rating reflects a placement percentage anyway. It’s not like the rankings and ratings on the ladder are scrambled. They correlate so the higher the rating, the higher the ranking, the smaller the top percentage.
It’s all the same. It’s just easier to understand if everything is apples to apples comparisons. In my opinion.
Lmao no. Gladiator title should be top 0.5% as well. Its the prestige of those titles.
1 Like
You can tell that you really do never play arena from this one sentence, Jito.
Some seasons the highest players in the world are 3500cr and other seasons the highest players in the world are 2950cr.
How on absolute earth does that make percentage cutoffs and a static numeric cutoff interchangeable? If you set the bar for rank 1 at 3000cr then some seasons you’ll have over 400 people ‘achieve’ it and other seasons 3 players will get it.
It’s changes like this that made the gladiator title a complete joke to get. I have friends who were never glad before BfA and have it now and didn’t feel even 5% of the excitement I felt getting my first glad because of a stupid static cutoff that doesn’t rise during incredibly inflated seasons such as BfA season 1.
Yes exactly my point. Hota cut off was around 2850 on season 1. Season 2 hota cutt off has been 2420.
It should be top 0.5% for glad
I’m about to go to bed, but I’ll try to explain it in a quick way - bear with me.
Lots of players, high top ratings:
Few players, low top ratings:
The EU ladder is highly-populated. If you look at it, then the top 500 players, aproximately, have the Elite Gold Tier (Rating above 2370+).
The KR ladder is very low-populated. Only 11 players have the Elite Gold Tier there.
So even though the rating level is lower on the KR ladder compared to the EU ladder, then percentage-wise the system adjusts according to the populations. The EU ends up having more players in the Elite Gold Tier, because it has more players paticipating than the KR ladder has.
The top rating level and the number of players within the 0,5% cutoff, they each reflect the overall player participation within the ladder. The ladder system derives both of them from the overall player participation.
Except that’s a misconception. You should already be aware of what I’ve said about it, I won’t bother to repeat it all.
Except it’s not. I refer to the above.
Anyway, bed. 
Except it is, they can make it faster to go from 2350 to 3000 than it takes from 1850 to 2350 if they want to. And because they don’t reveal those system-wide alterations each time they do 'em, you get an artificial placement of players in each rating range.