Is it because your main is controversial or not particularly liked by some posters so a way to avoid that drama/focus? That’s actually a geniune question!
I mean, it’s why I assume post people do use alts to post, next to trolling like some previous examples of posters in this thread and elsewhere & or having to jump between diffrent characters alot for other reasons.
Jesus Christ! And I thought this blue dragon hipster was bad!
I am just the product of countless of posts like Zag’s. Don’t worry, perhaps you’ll find the middle ground.
Not to mention most of his posts (minus the ones where he cries about being “bullied”) are Exactly all “Haha funny, haha you all stupid.”
That would point more towards that then or the trolling as I mentioned. But it’s most of the time fairly easy to tell/understand when someone is using an altposter purely to cause distress or more nefarious reasons, like a few well known examples at this point.
But other times, I try to be a little lenient since I technically altpost myself. Vixi was my rp main for ages and forum main now since forever, but she is technically not my main character still, nor my first forum main since I’ve mentioned before, i felt really unsettled by some events to made me change to Vixi a long time ago. So there can be more reasons why people altpost beyond just my examples or this.
I have a very hard time trying to understand what you meant by all the bs you wrote here Zagkush.
Perhaps lay off for a while? You ain’t making much sense anyways.
Lol! You should Red Venture to a dictionary and look up what being banned means! Do I have to spell it out!
Zag’kush isnt my main either but I have used it for a long while on the forums now and he shall remain my forum alt.
As for the Lame lvl 10 poster, you call him bad while supporting his dimwitted posts? LOL! Be honest for once in your damn life.
In actuality I don’t have to do either because I’m just pointing out how pseud you are. Again, your posts read like a non-native English speaker trying to be hyper-intelligent but basically amounts to flailing around like an ape. I can make the point that philosopher is a subjective title people can apply to themselves, but you were the one making the claim that she isn’t one; so the burden of proof was yours. Back up your subjective point, which you failed to do for your endless posts of nonsense.
it’s also mega embarrassing + cringe to continue arguing on the forums endlessly - i’m off back to continue reading mishima’s temple of the golden pavilion - so honestly stop being dense / slow
ok didnt ask dont care + ur tmog is trash
If youre banned then stay banned, no one will miss a parasite who refuses to grow up.
Your Zizek may have defeated my Derrida card…
Eyes gleam, adjusts hat as camera pans out
But it now prime target for my Nagarjuna card, which I play, slaps the card down firmly , and with his powerful Madyamikakarika ability I cast aside the rules of your constructed-unconstructed polemic and cause the game to enter into a third “middle way” ruleset!
Then you’re not being coherent with yourself. I know why - you’re just a contrarian who wanted to have her moment against me. You didn’t care if what I was writing is arrogant or not, you just wanted to try to have the moral high ground and call me out as a troll. Well, now you are the troll, my dear.
Are you sure you’re not speaking about Rand here?
Oh mi god. This can’t be true. How can you dislike it?
I’ll do what I want! Stop trolling!
Dude can’t actually refute anything I say so he’s just vaguely saying I’m ‘incoherent’ while writing like a complete pseud.
Yeah, no. I’m not going to take that from someone who throws “solipsism” int a sentence randomly with little regard for whether it fits.
You are bad at quotations and, as shown from you using Wikipedia and Huff Po you are abysmal at sourcing your claims as well.
Science and philosophy are two entirely different topics with entirely different standards. Creationism is inherently anti-scientific, Rand’s rubbish is not inherently anti-philosophical.
It means that she is bad at it. That’s how language works. To give a comparable example people wouldn’t say that they don’t take JK Rowling seriously as a philosopher, they would say that she isn’t a philosopher, because she isn’t. You really underestimate the importance of wording in this subject.
You shouldn’t have said that, he’ll report your every post now.
No, it was pure arrogance. It was arrogant enough that you and Rand would probably get along famously.
The shoulders and staff looks a little off from the rest to me.
The shoulders? I thought they were the best piece tbh.
Edit.
Why? You’re making up the same thing, trying to claim you know how the academic language works in a field you haven’t been introduced to, and just to get your way around a discussion you know nothing about, which excludes Rand from the field of philosophy.
It’s the same thing, but worse. Double-standards are a hot take around here.