Ok then. Deduct survival, sub, enh and ret from melee. Those specs do dmg and cc from 30 yards or in the case of sub spend half the game running away. If dev and aug arent wizards, those 4 arent melee. If i kick a devoker, the casts stop and he cant do dmg. Therefore he is a caster. If i root a warrior the damage stops because he cant connect. If i root a ret and walk 10 yards away i still take full dmg rotation. Ret isnt a melee. Science is science
Run the numbers again and tell me did the % of wizards increase from 1800 to 2700?
Theyâre in the melee category. âRangedâ is not the same as âwizardsâ.
Melees are stronger than wizards, itâs a factual truth. The fact youâre disputing it when the factual information is freely available to you is quite weird. Is biased an understatement?
I guess Warriors arenât melee either then since they have Rend, Assa Rogues arenât melee because they have poisons, Ferals arenât melee because they have bleeds. Is that what youâre saying?
No. I cant reapply rend from 20 yards away. A ret can nuke you while standing below blades edge as you peak over the bridge. Can melees like warriors and ferals do that?
You cant have it both ways at once, dplover. Either mm is a wizard and ret is a melee, or mm isnt a wizard and ret isnt a melee. Personally i think option 2 is reality
You just did not understand what i said, it takes little thought, here is the context
He is imitating you
And here is the full text from what you quote me
There is certain ammount i suspect people to understand, so what you call my writing as gibberish is infact me just stateing the undisputable fact that nothing gets stronger depending the rating as every class work and remain the same just like the fact that arms indeed is one of the best dps currently in the game hence remain strong in any rating just like spec viability tied on ratings would be unlogical as there is no such thing its a myth people keep spreading
Now is it true that higher you go people understand more and as not all things are always not on our hands it gets easyer? Sometimes yes and sometimes no, there is variables that can make aspects of this claim untrue example there are bad players even on high mmr
Now the only undisputable fact we can make is that every class indeed is as strong on rating x as it was on rating y when it began its pushing, everything else is variables and assumptions which are not constant
The one fact also remains that arms warriors are one of the best dps in the meta
Brother I think you need to stop posting more on forums more than you actually play arena games.
Desperate to grasp at straws because youâre unequivocally wrong. Itâs a factual, statistical truth that melees are stronger than wizards. Denying it is a true testament to your intelligence.
Even if you classed Ret as a âwizardâ, there are still more melees at the highest rating than there are wizards, lol. Your fantasy world quite literally reinforces the point even more, so thank you for that.
Ironic from the guy that literally dodges most things Iâve said, then talks about a bracket that I wasnât even talking about, was wrong about that one as well, and then ignores everything I say about AWC vs ladder.
Truth hurts, and the truth is that ret are wizards. I dont make the rules. If you can do 85%+ dmg from 15+ yards, youâre a wizard. Donât hate the scientist for what he discovers.
You mean where using your science, you can make an argument that Preservation is the best healer and that Balance is the best caster? That in spite of a drastic representation imbalance at the highest ratings, you argue the inferior Wizard category is still âdominantâ? That you refute/ignore (itâs ignore) the rebuttal to your argument of âwizards get stronger the higher they goâ which is a straight up lie and evidenced in factual statistics?
Is this a euphemism for âfeed my plants because Iâve been posting on forums too longâ?
Can you imagine the meltdown of these Warrior players if at 3k rating in 3s there were 7 casters and 3 melees and caster players were arguing that âmelees are dominantâ?
Amazing how much trash you can speak when you are mediocre at the game. When are you finally going to get good instead of wasting months of your life on these forums?
I have a First Class Bachelors degree in Law and Iâm in the middle of studying for a Masters degree. If Iâm wasting my life, what on Earth are you doing?
What qualifications did you need for shelf stacking? A GCSE?
Clearly above mediocre. In fact, using your little friend Leechâs own logic here, I am in fact better than you because my peak is still higher than yours Unlucky man, maybe next season you can spam another 3k games with r1 players and you might beat it.
You finished the season at 2843 in spite of spam playing thousands of games with r1 players (on voice), an impressive 286 rating higher than a Shadow Priest in a melee dominant meta that played 430 games on no voice and hasnât queued 3s since September.
For the record: no, thereâs not, especially from SP pov. They all play like monkeys and it doesnât matter because the class is literally a walking counter to everything my spec can do.
Highest this season was 2960, 400 rating higher than you, you got anything better for an insult than stacking shelves. I suppose when you have to overcompensate for the fact you are mediocre at the game you have to pretend to have degrees and irl commitments.
posting on forums too longâ?