You would yeah. Fits your agenda.
Same question to you then⊠Do you think Blizzardâs handling of the Hong Kong situation was good behaviour then?
Have you answered my earlier question yet btw?
Indirectly I suppose this would be it?
And you use that as an excuse to play games rather than actually do some REAL research? How very millennial. 
I still donât believe any of it. Show me proof and Iâll be quiet about it. 
Until that moment, Iâll treat this thread as the spam that it is.
Blizzard defined a set of rules, the rules were broken, end of story.
Oh nonono. You misunderstand my friendâŠ
BLIZZARD acted within the rules for banning him. But was blasted by MANY MANY people for it as being awful and unethical behaviour.
THAT is what I mean. They acted within the rules, but many people think their behaviour was bad.
So, your statement of âIf itâs within the rules itâs good behaviourâ just holds no water. Acting within the rules can be bad behaviour. Not in a legal sense, but surely in an ethical or social way.
How strange, dear friend. You seem to be talking to yourself. 
Rude. So rude.
And obviously scared of my very true statements based on logic and facts.
You KNOW Iâm right and youâre scared to debate this. Thanks for helping my point even more. It just proves what kind of person you are.
More trolling for me to report. Just keep proving me right pal. 
When youâre ready for an adult conversation about this, Iâll be right here.
People like to be offended 
But, you are off topic. IRL comparisons have nothing to do with playing a video game.
But they do. They, as you did, claim that âplaying within the rules is always goodâ but thatâs simply not true. And what theyâre doing is bad behaviour. So itâs very much on topic.
Besides⊠This whole fake topic is basically off topic for this forum. Iâm surprised mods are letting it slide.
But to get back to this remark you madeâŠ
That means you approve of how Blizzard handled the HK situation then?
A simple yes or no will do. 
Breaking rules is bad behaviour.
Yes, I approve of an eventâs rules being enforced 100% when a participant accepted those rules to gain entry to the event.
When a player enabled War Mode, they accepted the rules, which means complaints about PvP are invalid.
This says enough. Aight mate, conversation over.
Obey the rules and no problems
Tell that to all the people who have actual morals and standards. 
The ones that disobey rules that they previously agreed to?
You just donât get it. This is not about breaking rules or not. 
This is about bad behaviour, whether itâs within a set of rules or laws or isnât, doesnât matter (except for the legality, but thatâs not what Iâm talking about here as Iâve made abudantly clear).
Anyway, youâve proven what kind of person you are. Iâve made my point. End of discussion.
Have a nice evening.
Vaeyn made the spooky voices stop! What a legend, this druid 
Iâm done with him. Not with you.
Youâre still ignoring all of my points, which just makes my points all the stronger.
And your childish replies only help me.
Bad behaviour is subjective. What you consider bad behaviour is not what others consider bad behaviour. If itâs within the gameâs rules itâs legitimate behaviour - as stated by Blizz.
I created a survey on War Mode ethics, and the results are very interesting. Most of the respondents have no problem with what you would classify as bad behaviour. Yet others will consider it bad behaviour. Best to just play the game lol. If you donât like PvP, turn off War Mode.
WM Ethics Survey
https://www.surveymonkey.com/results/SM-CVSV5LZZV/
Alright; one more reply just because you have the decency to reply in a normal and informative manner (unlike OP and company).
Sure, as are most things. But when the opinion on a behaviour belongs to a vast majority for instance, does it still remain subjective or does it become âthe normâ? Now thereâs some real social research for ya!
And thatâs not something I disputed. Yes, itâs legitimate. Doesnât make it right.
But thatâs not the big problem I have with these peopleâŠ
Theyâre hiding their behaviour behind the label of âresearchâ or âsocial experimentâ. Which is wrong in and of itself.
And thatâs presuming those labels are real (which I think theyâre not because Iâve not been given any reason to take OPâs word on it; just look at his behaviour and replies).
I think this is a thread with a hidden agenda. Whether thatâs humblebragging, recruitment, trolling or all of the above is not clear. That is why Iâm making a point of this.
It makes it right, because YOU agreed to it when you enabled War Mode.
PvP Example: If you agree to be ganked by enabling WM, and then complain when you are ganked⊠you are the one in the wrong.