It’s obvious and has been stated, it’s a recent change and they haven’t gotten around to removing the pet as it’s unobtainable.
Blizzard are known for dragging their heels on things like this. Some stuff removed in Cataclysm is still there.
It’s obvious and has been stated, it’s a recent change and they haven’t gotten around to removing the pet as it’s unobtainable.
Blizzard are known for dragging their heels on things like this. Some stuff removed in Cataclysm is still there.
I’m raising a legitimate point and you are just trolling at this point now
It’s the truth, again, just because you don’t like the answer, you think it’s trolling.
OK, but is habit really a mitigating factor?
I’m thinking how that would play in a different context, in court:
“Yeronner, Yes, my client may have robbed the bank, but my client is known for robbing banks. He was convicted of robbing banks back in Cataclysm.”
I’m not sure that leads to an acquittal.
You are probably right that Blizzard won’t relent on this, and I have no doubt they have the legals sewn up, but that doesn’t mean they shouldn’t take a little forum heat for it.
Blizzard collection is pretty bad at it overall, even containing stuff never released ingame
No, but I think we all need to be a bit of masochists to have sticked with Blizzard until now. We know stuff like this will happen.
Fair point.
Except I don’t expect this specific type of behaviour from them.
Still, fair point.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.