By your own definition you are whining.
Clearly you donât.
You keep repeating the same words over and over like they have any impact- But much like in the pvp gearing thread, people just keep dumping them to the bin because they donât add anything to the list.
You yourself agreed that SPâs lack in utility, so thatâs already omitting that their performance isnât ideal in m+.
I do play the game, just not the same way as you do- In fact, youâd be pushed to find anybody who 1:1 does the exact same thing as you do, and I think that youâre being a bit pretentions trying to put yourself in this pedestal telling that everybody else is wrong but somehow you are right, when you have only succeeded in getting the terms wrong all the time.
I complain about the state of my class because I want it to improve. Does that mean that I canât do content with it? Of course not. Nobody said that. Does that mean that because the class can perform, nothing is wrong with it? Of course not. By that logic, thereâs literally never been anything wrong about the game ever in the history of the game and people should just bow their heads down and play the game and not complain.
That kind of attitude has a name by the way. Simping for mediocrity. You call us out for whining about perfectly reasonable things that frankly do not impact you in any way, yet you are simping for no changes and keeping your head down while simultaneously spending hours on these forums pointing out that you do in fact care- Which makes your entire point moot.
Class being unfun = Class is not good.
You also admitted that priestâs performance does fall (namely, in utility), so thereâs also that. Thats your words, not mine.
Itâs not my fault that you get the terms mixed up. I never said that I am ONLY talking about performance. You did. Youâre making up these arguments, not me.
Ah yes if everyone just played the game and kept their mouth shut everyone would be happy.
Thanks mr. Shapiro but instead I will decide for myself- Further, where is your proof that everyone would just really enjoy the game if they performed at max level? Because I am still waiting for the grand argument where you equate that performance = fun.
I do play the game. I leveled my alts, I do visions weekly. I occasionally run a m+ with my friends. Occasionally I do BGâs.
I complain because I am not happy with the way the game is- As is everybody else. That doesnât mean I hate the game to the point I will quit, but I do retain the obvious freedom to point out the obvious problems with the game that exist- Like the ones you yourself admitted to.
What does pulling a random DPS stat out of your bum have to do with it? Are you saying that a class that has to multidot hardcast abilities and ramp up voidform which duration you can not by the way control out of combat does not have backloaded damage, which means that if the mobs die before those dots use their full turn, its wasted time?
You cite logic as a reason for your arguments, yet you ignore it when itâs convenient.
Itâs also worth to point out that even when SP was arguably the best ranged in the game during Eternal Palace tier in raiding, people still complained about the dullness and borrowed power reliance of the spec, with very little variance existing. Thatâs right, even when the spec was the BEST it EVER WAS during BFA, even top tier people complained. In fact, if you go to mage forums you see the exact same thing with them regarding mechagon bracers, despite them being the n1 dps spec atm.
Your own logic is failing.
Yes, it is a problem for arguably all classes but if you were to equate the problems of for example SPâs borrowed power to that of a monk youâd be making a dishonest comparison. As Ellipsis points out, thereâs a few specs in the game that require as much star aligning as an SP does- Not are any of them nearly as punishing if you do not get those things right, save for maybe feral.
I never said he did, quote me where I said that, please. I said he has, like I have, pointed out the problems with the spec.
Also thanks for admitting you lied, since you said:
Borrowed power are part of a classâs gameplay so you admit he did in fact talk about them. So you lied.
He also frequently points out that void form is inherently, and has been, problematic since itâs conception so thatâs a lie too. He has said he doesnât necessarily know what to do with it, only that it has to go or be changed substantionally.
If you are going to call me out, at least donât get your facts wrong man.
You said they are a good class, yet if they are so good class, why are they so little played in m+?
Again, the quantity numbers are on my side.
Can you quote what I said so I know what are you referring to? Because that doesnât sound like something Iâve said.
Those and M+, raiding, pvp, in fact most content, yeah. Just because they can perform doesnât mean they are in a good state- I mean, WW is at the bottom of the dps meters in raiding, but people still play them all the same because the class itself is fun. That means that the class is not in a good state, even though it can perform- Though in WW monkâs case it is because of lack of damage, rather than with priests lack of mobility and utility they used to have baseline.
Nobodyâs asking for equal performance, and again, I am not speaking of performance alone. Again, if they buffed SPâs damage by a hundred times, the class would still not be in a good state because it is unfun to play and has way too many borrowed power mechanics and abilities (e.g. voidform) that make the class a mess.
Youâre the one who keeps bringing up performance as the sole metric by which you measure whether a class is good or not, I donât. Thatâs your words, not mine.
Pointing out your lies, calling out your arguments flaws and pointing out your own arguments contradict between one another.
No, your mindset said that âYeah SP can perform on (insert arbitrary m+ or raiding levelâ, a fact I never denied. Please find a quote where I ever said that.
Where I argued, from the start, that in warriors case, nobody is saying that deepwounds is underpowered or somehow detrimental to the classâs performance: In fact, quite the opposite. People just do not find it fun at all and it is literally asked from PVE and PVP players alike to be removed.
Youâre so detached from the reality that you canât fathom that some people can dislike an ability or a passive just for its existance or function, rather than itâs performance. I mean, disci priest from WOTLK is a good example: You just literally spammed bubbles on the entire raid. Thats it. IF you did anything else you were playing it wrong. The spec was performing AMAZING, yet a lot of people found it very frustrating and unfun to play and to compete against.
I could pull a hundred more examples but the answer is the same. You made these arguments, not me. Youâre mixing apples with oranges and when I point out the obvious flaws with your arguments you fall into your own making and scream that weâre all mean and wrong.
The majority of players are not finding it fun- Else, it wouldnât be acknowledged as such by Blizzard themselves. The feedback is crystal clear in Spriests case, so as I said- I didnât even need to argue this with you, because as I said, I am right.
Blizzard proved I am right. You are wrong. Itâs not about adapting and overcoming, itâs about adjusting a fundamentally flawed game design and proposing how to do that.
I genuinely wonder if a LFR raider stole your wife or something because you have such an issue with them- or whiners. What ever did those people do to you to make you so hateful toward them lol.
Either way, as I said, you canât win this argument because you lost right at the start- You started arguing against yourself, against concepts I never proposed in the first place. You did. So by definition, you are knocking yourself out.