Stuff like this confuses me.
Ideally what we’d all like on an RP server, is a world where the RP feels like it’s the number one factor you know? Be it big, small or otherwise. So at any point should our fancy so decide it, we can lose ourselves in Azeroth from anywhere to 30 mins to 4 hours.
Now the PCU is a community that actually is taking proactive steps to try and do this, by making events that are open access for the server, and thrust RP into the spotlight to make it that principle factor it should be.
But when they do, it seems the order of the day is criticism from many. Why?
I’m not saying their events are necessarily perfect, nor suited to absolutely every taste, but they’re potent and they’re back by a cadre of individuals whom want to make RP their focus.
I feel like rather than sniping from the sides, a lot of people would be better off either considering communicating with the PCU directly, or even collaborating. Contrary to popular belief not all guilds in it are attached to the puppet strings of Perroy, but are simple guilds signed up to the basic premise of RP standards and looking to benefit from the large player pool.
Attend an event that wasn’t to your tastes exactly? Then try and be part of the creative force that bore it and get involved so you can throw your ideas into the mix.
This whole “I’m not part of the PCU nor do I interact with them…but…I have this to say about their events and think they should do X.” Is akin to someone taking issue with the efforts of a local council in some areas say, but making absolutely no effort to engage with their local politics, nor be part of it, not interact with the councillor or their team. Instead they moan in their back garden loudly and hope the councillor hears them.
If you do genuinely want change and believe genuinely you’ve identified legitimate causes for concern, what do you have to lose by interacting with the folks directly? You’ll either be proven wrong and a better solution you want will come out of it, or you’ll be proven right and have the evidence to back it up.
Is it possible people are afraid of the interacting in this way because they want to believe what they’ve heard and they don’t want to be faced with the prospect that they’re wrong? Plenty of people love to have a shadowy cabal to hate on, it makes one feel like a brave defector after all, a freethinker. It’s possible imo that this is the case, because if people were serious about these things, why waste time faffing about on the forums?