The game is dead buff mmr another 200 so we finally csb plsy that mess u never Balance
1 Like
quite the opposite actually the more inflation = more player participation you dont have to be a genius to figure that one out players who are high on the ladder strive for rank 1 inflation does not hurt anyone.
The best players in the game are going for rank 1 gladiator is just a mount and title for them of which they have many.
We are analyzing healers situation and rewards in SS (November 2022). Meanwhile they still monitoring situation 
2 Likes
my resto shammy did 150 something games because of how terrible MMR and CR is for healers in SS
you cant balance rating when there is 6 rounds, most games you go 3-3 and 0 rating
rating for healers in SS should have another metric on top of the win to lose ratio
id suggest, healing done overall, if it goes 3-3 the healer wih the most healing and less damage taken gets +5 in mmr or cr
Lol, that’s the dumbest idea. Everybody will start to play rdruid, just because overall they heal like 30% more than any other healer every round. It will disbalance healer bracket even more. Sometimes you need to heal less, because your DPS actually uses their defensives and you end up winning with 2-3 million less healing done than other healer. Just look at hpala, healer with arguably weakest HPS, but the strongest CDs and defensives, most likely will lose in healing done and HPS to every other healer
1 Like
Unless they will somehow figure out how to implement round 7 into the SS, there’s no point discussing rating gains for 3-3.
Something like to calculate damage done and damage taken by the DPS, and pair n1 with n3 to favor him for playing better(dealing more damage and taking less damage throughout previous 6 rounds), but it is to much calculation and programming for a multidollar indie company like Blizzard, and most likely, people will complain and moan even more about it as well
And another question, what is the point of round 7, if one of the players already 4-0, 5-0, 6-0. Just for the healers to figure out who is better and who deserves rating? So round 7 will only benefit healers, but not DPS, and we don’t want that as well
How so?
Your Warlock is 1500 in 3s with a 48% win rate from 150 games (more losses than wins).
You are 2200 in solo shuffle from 1300+ rounds with a 50% win rate.
Your Feral Druid is 1700 with a 51% win rate from 650 rounds, and 1600 in 2s with a 49% win rate from 95 games (more losses than wins).
Your Resto Shaman is 1900 from 353 rounds with a 49% win rate (more losses than wins).
Your Disc Priest is 1800 from 400 rounds with a 50% win rate (with more losses than wins).
Your Holy Paladin is 1300 from 48 rounds with a 29% win rate (more losses than wins).
Does it not occur to you that maybe, just maybe you’re at your peak on those classes and the problem isn’t the rating and MMR, it’s…you?
1 Like
First season I was top 60 EU Rsham.
But currently, pushing as healer is too RNG.
And tbh idc about you analysing my winrate of classes I didn’t play for months.
BTW I am also better performing than you in SS, and I also don’t suggest it’s you-problem.
This would be true if I wasn’t 200 rating higher than you on a 10x worse spec from, checks notes, 1100 LESS rounds, LOL. Not even hitting 2400 this season yet as a Destro lock is absolutely embarrassing. I’ve seen you play in on of my lobbies btw, you are VERY lost.
The MMR isn’t a problem, you are, because you’re bad and lose more than you win in more brackets than you don’t.
your peak is 2485, my peak is more than 2900, that’s more than 400 rating difference…
now get lost, idc about your pathetic insults where you pretend this isn’t the case
Your peak is undoubtedly from DF S1 when you could be 2600 in 100 rounds (I know you could, because I was). Also my peak is inaccurate because it didn’t update with name changes. You’re a 0x glad, you’re hardstuck on one of the best specs, you lose more than you win more than you don’t. You are a horrific player, factually. Stop blaming the MMR and learn to play the game. Cheers.
Nope, 2485 is your peak. And yes, you could be higher. You just weren’t. I was.
Now stop insulting.
If you have no arguments other than ad hominem, it kinda shows I am right.
And now look at you, chronically spamming solo shuffle on one of the best specs and hardstuck at 2.2.
Imagine losing more than you win more than you don’t and having the audacity and the arrogance to blame everything but yourself.
People are playing your spec at 2700, you can’t even get out of 2200.
Wahhhh Blizzard reward me for being garbage and losing more than I win, wahhhhhhhhh, fix the MMR wahhhhhh, I should be +50 for going 0-6 wahhhhhhh.
Although Solo Shuffle is completely irrelevant and a meme because of players like you who have achieved nothing valuable in your entire time playing suddenly think you’re decent because of giga inflated numbers in a meme season, here’s my rating from 100 rounds of shuffle in season 1, and in season 3 when I was in the top 6 in the final stages of the season. I believe they call that ‘factually incorrect’.
1 Like
It’s the only bracket, in which your output isn’t diluted by your teammates boosting you 
Never said that. Kinda shows you know you’re right when you have to make up my arguments rather than addressing my real arguments.
You already shown you’re wrong. Now stop harrassing.
Oh cool so me being 200+ rating higher than you from 1100 rounds less on a 10x worse performing spec is just a testament to how good I am? Cheers man!
You think MMR and rating gains are an issue when you’re a player that loses more than you win.
For once in your life, MAKE an argument, how is there an MMR and rating issue?
This isn’t an argument lol.
2 Likes
dont bother, the only joy this poor soul finds in life is checking everyone else’s rating and belittling them about it.
1 Like
I mean, it’s a bit strange to complain that Blizzard are ‘doing nothing’ about MMR and rating gains as a player that’s losing more than they win, don’t you think?
3 Likes