They got time to fix their mage mistakes. hunters money not as good as mage money, hunters where they want them. can i get my money back for the entire expansion & 8 months of sub, didnt know hunter wasnt supported by blizzard
Iâll tell you what Blizzard has done in the 8 months since the expansion.
When he had made the Hunter Bm really competitive with 10% more damage than the KC, just after a week they removed it againâŚ
Meanwhile I have not seen any nerf of Paladin, SP and other classes defined as META.
But Iâve come to the conclusion that itâs pointless to complain in this forum because Devs team doesnât read or because itâs not interested on our class.
There is a clear separation between the META and non-META classes and for me, and I emphasize for myself, there shouldnât be this difference and the ability to play should be rewarded without only certain META classes being arbitrarily advantaged.
This is just my thought.
I am aware of it.
I wrote wrong because I should have written âConsistent Nerfsâ but I had taken it for granted since we are talking about really mild nerfsâŚ
We also talked about it here regarding the Priest:
Same thing on the paladin.
Do you consider the 3% a real Nerf since after the rework this class has become OP and META?
The Fire mage corrected the nerf as itâs definitely exaggerated right now.
Well like you say, you just said âany nerfâ which is why I linked above.
But 3% off ret along with a bunch of defensive stuff is completely fine. Ret is definitely not too strong at the moment. 0 rets in the top 100 timed keys, compared with almost all of them being fire/aug/SP. So it depends how loose you define âmetaâ I guess, but ret certainly isnât one of the absolute strongest right now.
I consider META all classes that generally perform better than the Hunter or classes comparable to it, both from a defensive and damage point of view.
For me (so I go by feeling) Enh Shaman, Dudu Balance, Priest Shadow, Paladin Retry, probably the Rogue sub and certainly more after the next rework are classes that are placed on a higher step and I define them as META.
And they have been, except for the Shammy, reworked and have received more attention from the developers.
And to show that I was aware of it I also posted an old post by Jerby where he talked about the Priestâs Nerf after my question.
I also wrote that I wrote it wrongâŚ
But why do you always think badly of people?
Defintly would be, being better then hunter dont make you meta.
Meta is referred to by the speccs which are used in the most ideal comp. I.e
Current meta is Vengence DH / Holy paladin / Aug evoker / Shadow priest / Fire mage. Ofcourse you then have pug met (which this time round matchs the meta) and raid meta, which can defintly differ from. M+ then pvp meta which again can change.
Ofcourse as far as im aware ironically hunter isnt meta in any of the game modes above haha
You right.
A step below Meta such as Dudu Balance,Enh Shaman,Warlock Destro,Paladin Ret, from the point o view of dps,def Cds,and utility.
This classes are anyway better then Hunter.