Hello guys like the Title explains, we have a Threatening Problem its called Chatgpt, i dont think everyone knows what this is, because its still “new out of the factory”
but with everyday this Ai thing keeps improving, unless u wont recognize if it is a Human, or a Robot
i have seen Plenty Posts, comments what came out of the Chatgpt factory, it isnt even easy to recognize that its like we are living in the Future
But with “high tools” there should be also Rules/ a policy about it, to forbid Chatgpt Posts/comments what came From Chatgpt
Why is this a Problem u may Ask?
Because it uses Algorithm based from Doctors, and really Intelligent Humans. but combined in one pot what makes a dangerous combo
dangerous combo for what? simple, to Troll People, or Manipulate them without doing anything, u can lead Chatgpt to a point where it writes a essay for you, how to trick People, or to incite them against each other to send the Forum post under Fire
chatgpt takes the inspiration and math calculation of the most famous psychologists, and close to everyone what knows what to type in chatgpt, can create such an chaos with just few simple mouseclicks
Counterargument: ChatGPT is a Tool – Its Impact Depends on How We Use It
While the concerns about AI like ChatGPT are understandable, the argument that it should be banned from forums or treated as an inherent threat is an overreaction. Here’s why:
AI is Just a Tool – Like Any Other, It Can Be Used for Good or Bad
The post suggests ChatGPT is dangerous because it can manipulate or troll people, but the same could be said about any powerful tool—Google, Wikipedia, or even persuasive human writers.
The real issue isn’t AI itself, but how people choose to use it. Banning ChatGPT posts won’t stop bad actors; they’ll just find other ways to spread misinformation. Instead, forums should focus on better moderation and critical thinking among users.
AI Doesn’t Have Intent – Humans Do
ChatGPT doesn’t “decide” to manipulate people—it responds to prompts. If someone uses it to incite chaos, the blame lies with the human, not the AI.
The comparison to “dangerous algorithms based on doctors and psychologists” is misleading. AI doesn’t “combine” human intelligence maliciously—it processes data statistically, without intent or consciousness.
AI Detection and Moderation Are Improving
The post claims AI content is hard to detect, but tools like OpenAI’s classifier, watermarking, and third-party detectors (e.g., GPTZero) are evolving rapidly.
Instead of banning AI outright, forums could implement transparency rules (e.g., labeling AI-generated content) while still allowing useful contributions.
AI Can Actually Improve Discussions
Many users rely on ChatGPT for helpful purposes—improving writing, brainstorming ideas, or explaining complex topics. Banning it entirely would punish positive uses.
If forums are worried about low-effort spam, they can set rules against lazy copy-pasting rather than banning AI outright.
Conclusion: Regulation Over Prohibition
Instead of fearing AI as an uncontrollable threat, we should advocate for smart policies—like disclosure requirements and better moderation—while recognizing that humans, not machines, are responsible for misuse. Banning ChatGPT completely is an extreme solution that ignores its benefits and the reality that malicious users will always find ways to cause harm.
Isn’t it possible someone used AI tools to overcome a language barrier, or to make a point more concise and clear? Not everyone is able to articulate their thoughts in small, readable paragraphs, and properly separated by Oxford commas. And I’d rather read an AI response that has a TLDR section than a post that has each line its own paragraph or the entire 500 post as one single sentence.
i mean - if you dont learn very fast how to use / do correct prompts for AI chatbots - you will have horrible time at work and in life in incoming years mate.
to pratice the prompts for your hobby / wow - is a brilliant idea
