Friendly reminder, if you want more AoE - then they got to reduce our priority DPS.
The higher up you go in key levels, the longer packs live beyond the CDs of the AoE leads, the closer we get to them in value in general. You can’t expect us to have as much as a 80% lead on sustained ST DPS in m+ builds, if we are not weaker on AoE in general in that environment.
If we don’t do 2-3m ST on the boss, to carry the UDKs, Boomies and Rets doing significantly less, the overall DPS of the whole group goes down.
The best overall efficiency DPS of a key will have the different DPS profiles work together, even if it doesn’t show directly on the overall for each individual. As long as Fury does its job and well, we are fine if not more than that, it just doesn’t seem like it.
Do I agree that Fury should get more AoE instant punch through their big AoE CDs? Sure, 100%. That will really help with the community perception of Fury looking bad; as we look really bad Vs say a Ret doing 12m, while we do 6m - even if by the end of the pull it averages closer to 5m vs 4m. Not to mention, AoE burst makes Fury more fun to play. Yet, we can’t expect that AoE burst to last as long as others, nor that it effects overall AoE DPS to a too great degree. It is more to soften the impact of those who look at meters and judge based on ‘who do big number, who smoll?’ on the first seconds of a hero AoE pull.
You can kinda think of it as an Augmentation situation. How many times did you not see people who didnt know the fact of matter complain about how inefficient Aug was, “just look at its raw DPS!” Fury is in kind of that situation right now, just not to an equal extreme extent; in how having one Fury in your group will affect everyone else overall performance for the better. But not by it itself carrying all the damage, just by moving damage around.
It is a problem that, the impression of “fury only did half that of ret!” sticks, even if it isn’t true. It isn’t true in the key as a whole. Even less true if you start to value Prio damage that helps Ret retain its gained overall advantage on the meter, thanks to prio dam killing the boss faster.
The longer the boss fight, the lower the overall. We push the groups overall up, by being a bit weaker on it ourselves. Fury warrior is literally doing the thankless job of carrying the team through the boring bit. No praise, no glory… just unpopularity and shame.
If the prio damage value Vs the loss of AoE potential proves to be a problem in higher level keys. Then we will likely see something happen to address that in tune of Meat Cleaver (the Fury AoE cleave enabler) tune up or the passive AoE procs (blast and reap) being improved.
If the problem remains in the community perception of Fury being low, due to overall meters and extreme AoE scenarios. Then we likely will see something like an AoE CD buff to make that better.
Are we in a situation right now, where we really need a buff to improve overall potential impact?
I honestly can’t say. My take is that our damage profile is currently is too flat and as such a bit dull. It is annoying to look weak on AoE. But, then again, I cant stress this enough, I carry the Single Target in the group. If I do 2.8million, when my mate paladin does 1.5m on ST. Then it doesn’t annoy me as much that he got a 500k lead on the overall. Quite a chunk of that overall remains as it is, thanks to me killing off the boss as quickly as I do, saving the whole group a ton of time.
Hopefully, this helps the ones out there who feel really bad about playing Fury see that it isn’t that bad and you are a valuable part of the team. Even if it does feel and look bad when you look at the raw overall number in a vacuum.