Because everyone hoped for WoD to be back unfortunately Ion is stubborn and ignores feedback.
3 Likes
I am happy , fore people like me who play both PvP and PvE, you know the whole game not just one part, that system is awsome
I am happy , fore people like me who play both PvE and abuse their rewards in PvP
Corrected for you
4 Likes
Blizzard please fix we are indeed falling behind
are both better than unholy, mm or affliction atm
most people are around ilvl 200 only very few are actually 210+ because it requires mythic raiding and duelist and luck i would assume :o
donāt think 5 ilvls will make a huge difference either.
Also most glads not running around in 184 gear either.
As always most dedicated players pvp or pve will still whatever it takes to get the highest gear.
Nobody said it is good that you have to go hc/mythic raiding currently but well its what we got since 2 years so no change here. M+ in bfa were easily accessible for big gear while I see in SL m+ are much harder in the beginning and the end of run ilvl of a 15 is just 210 ilvl as well.
max dungeon in s1 bfa was also just +10 if I remember correctly
I really donāt understand whats so good in new PvP gearing? Low conquest cap? Useless fresh 60? If you didnāt get 2100 rating in first two weeks ā youāll be useless. Cause for upgrade gear you also need BG. On BG doesnāt have any mmr.
Actually, I like bursty PvP, fast and hard. But I donāt like that on Arenas I see mostly DC, WW, Sub, Unholy, Owl, Fireā¦ who else? There is no balance.
Arenas is hard also cause find the team. With my Warrior I have found some how teams from pre-made system and get 1500+ rating (also in Fury spec). But with my cat situation different. Totally unlucky. Get 1300 rate. Next day only loses, cause canāt find of team.
So this is basically my problem, yeah? But any chances to upgrade gear to 213, and start being useless on BG. When more ppl will get 207/213 BG will be unplayable in 190 ilvl.
So wahtās good in new PvP at all, gear? Matchmaking? What? Only that we can buy gear from PvP vendor? huhā¦ okā¦
Do please share with us how unholy is a good pvp spec.
Dont know what arena you are playing, maybe another game? Cause unholy and dk in general are the least represented spec in rated pvp so far season 1.
Change unholydk with arms and ret and you are right.
without looking I guess that is not true at all.
yea dk currently is not exactly great, but it is far from the worst spec
Then just look. Pick any rating at arenamate.
2v2 Over 1500 rating: DK representation is 1,6%. DH is 1,5%.
Priest 18,5%, Paladin 17,9%, Warrior 11,3%, Monnk 10,5%, Shaman 10,1%, Druid 8,6%, Rogue 8,1%, Mage 6,2%, Hunter 3,2%, Warloc 2,4%.
Above 2k its around the same, but DH and DK sharing bottom with 1,6%.
In 3v3 its also more or less the same numbers. DH and DK being least represented by a mile.
Most of the specs represented multiple as much times as DK.
And forums are filled with fotm-players who want dk nerfed.
that are not specs, that are classes.
Many of those classes have a heal spec.
wanna bet BM hunter has a lower % and so does fury and some others too 
class maybe dk is bottom currently. Well one class needs to be bottom though. Too bad for me since I am leveling my dk currently for pvp D:
Both Unholy and Frost are in the very bottom in both 2v2 and 3v3.
There are other specs together with them in that bottom, with equally bad numbers, yes.
But the difference is that they have viable options within their classes. With the exeption of DH.
Fury, BM, Assa, Outlaw, low represented specs but with viable options in Arms, MM, Sub etc.
So DK being at the bottom as a class tells us that both Frost and Unholy are in a bad state.
well they just cannot cope with the oneshot meta and fall over quickly to those specs.
Bad state yes, unplayable, I donāt think so. Still got very high rated dks running around while I think Fury for example is borderline unplayable.
They have the option to switch to something better yes, but that is not a great option if you donāt like the other spec as they play completely different.
I like fury, but hate arms, so warrior is no option for me to play.
Point is blizz should also balance these specs not just say well just play other spec , might as well say just play one of the op classes.
DK still need help but I am not even sure what to give them. 5% more heal on death strike? Doubt that will chance the representation much either. Necrotic strike in this meta seems useless as well, even buffed.
Probably would make IBF a real def cd with some more % dmg red. e.g. 40%
Mes is 1# in us with dk so idk
yes I do think tsg and walking dead are still pretty strong, mainly of course due to their counter part and synergy.
as I said, there are several high rated dks around, so I would be careful with buffs at the moment
Its the same with affli its op but all are crying cause they cannot facetank 2 meeles like in bfa
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.