[Thunderfury, Blessed Blade off the Windseeker]
1 Like
But we all know Blizzard can’t balance things. We’ll play SMF or TG, but never both of them as a choice.
And TG is our identity.
I only play Fury with SMF. I like how it looks, it feels better too, in my opinion. Of course there are a bunch of other DW 1H specs out there, but they all play and look differently.
Honestly I wish more specs had the option; make weapon choice matter again! It would be nice if they did more with it… split talents for 1H & 2H, etc. 
Playing SMF should not cost 2 talent points considering TG does not. All they had to do was allow us to mog 2-handers into 1-handers and we’d be good to go.
But have subspec in spec is more interesting. Variability is a thing.
Could be interesting yeah but I doesn’t feel great having to “waste” two talent points when TG doesn’t have to. They’ll have to rework the SMF talents to make them more worthwhile.
I’m all for using two 1-handers, looks cooler than 2-handers imo.
Oh yea didnt see that one =o
Did a quick patchwork sim and if my math is correct it should result in a st dps gain of somewhere around 3.6% =P
Which is something I guess? 
Also pleasing to see other smf enjoyers out there 
Fury is totally fine if you flip the dps meter
Must be a you problem .
All the fury’s I see do prety descent in ST and AOE.
Check logs , i don’t made up numbers like you do. If you perform less then fury in any situation you seriously need to l2p
they should just make SMF talent point baseline passive like TG so SMF players can have usefull 2 points to spend elsewhere. so TG and SMF are passive players will feel more free to play whatever they like most and dont lose 2 talent points.and instead of SMF points they could add new one there to help bloodthirst and annilator builds. but i dont think any SMF buff will save fury now. we need strong rampage and execute
1 Like
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.